>>10914148 (lb)

n..ot really - i mean, i tried to pin it somehow to this letter but nope. not the company name, not my section, not my tasks. also, it happened late winter not very lately.. and i dont know any anons interested in q personally, sadly.

>>10914125 (lb)

i hoped for that kind of response, thank You anon, we'll sea

ok, had my food for thought for today, thx

have a blessed Sunday anons

also, if the creators of werathene.ws are scrolling here - THANK YOU GUYS! its the only site i can lurk at at work rn without looking suspicious (chans look like haxo4 shit for normies u know..)

>>10914282

thx

you could compress/redact it in a reading friendly way and post as yours, i care only bout the discussion, not the ids and 'who thought it first' game

>>10914319

wut

maybe i should be clearer

my posts and way of thinking are far from clarity

i assumed that u quoting me in full is not cause ure lazy (thats what it was, wasnt it?) but out of respect to anon posting it blabla kind of chanetiquette - so i proposed you make a 1 minute effort and compress it by redacting for regular scrollers to make them think and not get repulsed by the form of it (your post quoting me sucked in form bigly, no need to admit, its there to see)

aaand - clearly paranoid or just worn by the shit that flies around here daily and if u a regular u just immerse in it, sorry - i got accused of distraction and slide - well, lol. i also stated i only care about the discussion starting - you repeated that which is hilarious tbf. peace.

also, are u sure all are anon? no need to answer, just some unhealthy sarcasm triggered by your surprising comment. maybe we both lack in form and concentration, who knows.