It would seem to me that the war over the bread is causing more problems than anything else.

I also find it rather pedantic that people are gloating about one or another 'side' 'winning.'

As far as I am concerned, both of the parties staging this game of grab-ass with each other are acting like shills. On an anonymous image board, we have people trying to identify each other as some problem personality or another. It's the peak of asinine behavior to get into an argument about who is whom on this board as you either have the means to know, or you are making a guess based on feelz.

Now we have three breads with this number and a shit show of people pointing fingers, gloating, and for all any of us know, it's a couple fucking niggers pretending to be each other's enemy just to jam up and confuse the board.

This is why keel-hauling was invented, faggots. This shit is rude and causes the crew to use your skeleton to remove scallops from the hull.

>>10915356

I am sure Q knows who it is if Q has deemed it worth knowing.

Generally speaking, this is to be expected. Keep in mind that we are at war and the more advanced techniques get deployed when the heat turns up - and have been seeded ahead of time for a while.

The whole baker war thing was obviously seeded for some time and it is being deployed, now, by no coincidence. There will always be people who disagree on leadership and organization - it may be that the people doing it are anons who have been legitimately upset and think they are doing a good thing. In any case, the division is being pushed at this time by no coincidence.

>>10915442

I've had my grievances with some of the … Baking culture…? But I always have to balance idealism with practicality. Ideally - anarchy and order from chaos of an image board. Practically… There has to be some concept of organization.

I don't 'like' the "baking class" or the idea that bakers are becoming a sort of separate caste from normal anons and kind of play gatekeeper from time to time.

At the same time - I do understand why it gets done this way. We've gone to mostly being a news aggregate with some occasionally weird slides off into speculation on current events - largely as a defense against attempts to inject fake or misleading "digs" or intriguing things into the discussion. So people are unwilling to notable something that isn't ironically sourced from some main-ish-stream website.

I think they have hyped their role up in their head. The reality is that we are never going to see hundreds of thousands of people, much less millions, on these boards, directly. People just don't engage with the internet like we do, and many of us have probably bumped into each other on other more classic forums over the years.

Bakers have talked themselves up into believing we need to be prepared for the landing of thousands to the site and we need the place rigged up like disney-land rides or something for them.

So - I get why people would be upset with some of what has been going on, but I also don't think THE fight for the world begins and ends here. So creating a huge fuss to piss everyone off and get each other paranoid is silly.

I prefer to troll the bible fags and occasionally drop my knowledge and sources on Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood (that have only been notabled years ago, if ever). But Q posted the oath on my birthday, among some other things I noticed, so - in my mind I am highest ranking.