Anonymous ID: b46306 Oct. 4, 2020, 6:13 a.m. No.10915337   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5355 >>5356 >>5375 >>5376 >>5525

After yesterday's Baker drama we have (2) 13966 breads (3) 13967 breads, and no clear idea of which one to use.

the 'signing it' at paste bin was a problem. the person who seemed to be on the side of 'not signing in' and felt a great 'victory' from all the drama had said that for 8 months he'd been working on 'ousting' the baker team.

and some one kept talking about OSS.

 

one of the 13967 breads is complete.

one of the things that the cringe baker teams would love to do (they are 'dischord shills', or more unkindly AFLB is called a 'dischord tranny' by someone . . . (which is a name-calling thing, so I don't like to call them that, nor do I really know anything about if AFLB is really a tranny or whatever, or even a real person))

 

well, it's been months since the bakers were in full bitch mode most of the time.

and they did allow a lot fo bad hoaxes, and intentional gaslighting.

I guess the last straw was when . . .the baker didn't title a bread in a way that anon expected, as Q kept saying we don't need to be 'Q boosters' and it's better to put it all 'back inthe vault' (my term). This was about . . . ? it was such a big deal to me at the time . . . about?

 

someone named TLB and I have no idea who that is.

the kicker was about how we weren't suppose to be harping on some Hollywood woman (or ?) who is said to have had a miscarriage at an LA hospital.

and Q warned us to be nice and not jerks, and not gain attention. and the 'discord' person decided to not only encourage in the Teigan bashing, but also to add to it by putting stuff in notables that shouldn't have gone in notables.

and all kinds of anons: please don't title the bread like this. Please don't put this in notables. Please stop taunting the woman as if the photos here are posted by her.

 

When a 'push taint' happens it usually involves a long series of posts of a few breads and an obvious 'self' or 'team' nomination of dubious posts. And when that ahppens people usually tell the poster 'we saw this, this was already in notables. Stop with the copy pasta.

In my case I saw one adn I went after the poster saying that Q told us not to post stuff like this, that we are under observation. Taht 'ironic humor' is not allowed.

A point: some of the sample posts that the 'winner' of the baker-war posted . . . seem to have been 'ironic humor'. But when you read them without that thought, they read like the plan of a mean jerk.

when I posted my 'stop don't post this' point on Friday (I think) the 2nd I was then gang staulked by shills who accused me of being mean to the woman who had the misscarriage, when I was trying to say 'do not post this, we say it, this is old news. this is a push to smear the board by making us look callus' and it was! (maybe it was Saturday morning, I was on it for most of the day.)

 

 

the deal with some of hte, and the one who was the worst was really bad, is that no matter what is asked to do even if it's reasonable they can't get their noses away from the crotches in the photos that they post.

they intentionally misnumbered breads. They would intentionally mislabel bread titles.

ah, and the 'signing is' is so against the idea of an open board. And the 'humorous irony' that only works when you are with a friendly group could not be shout off by these people (or it was intentionally not shut off).

 

and at one point there was a person who must have been taken in by these others who was almost in a state of denial about the fact that the baker had left links that would track those who used that page to some click-counting site : two things bad there: tracking, advertisements (for which he/she might get paid).

the one who had finally rousted these, and stolen the bread from them, didn't have a way to clearly tell the story of what had gone on. That is why I am taking the time this morning to do it.

 

In my notes I've called it 'tainted baker' and 'tainted baker push notables'.

 

I took the conciliatory point trying not to take a side, as it could still be proven it was a lot on drama and nonsense (a show).

 

the real fact of everyone being troubled by Donald Trump being in the hospital (Walter Reed0 has everyone glum and pensive, and feeling like stuff isn't as 'winning' as we want it to be.

 

quest: who is TLB?

were all the bakers dischord bakers?

will the baking of the bread get any easier?

does it really matter if the bakers are tainted?

 

I'm glad that the issue has gotten some air. Time will tell if all the drama really fixed anything.

Anonymous ID: b46306 Oct. 4, 2020, 6:26 a.m. No.10915462   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5556

>>10915410

I am just telling you how it seems.

it could all just be a faken'gay

you are badgering me like you are picking a fight in the stadium stand.

if there were a need for you to get hold of all my huge collection of notes and screen caps, I'm not making it available as that would dox me.

 

PS: I'm not the enemy here. I merely describe. I even say I m not sure what's really going on.

but fog of war says 'take more notes.'

 

over the months I learned to tune out the baker-tainted push notables. So I'm a bit' blind' to it, so the drama yesterday was very sudden, and I didn't really get what happened.

so I figured I'd try to share my thoughts.

 

I didn't write a 'noose' as these notes.

PS: when it seemed like they were making a lunch date I thought it was sweet. It was like 5 in the morning and they were going to go for a walk on a beach or something.

 

anyway, maybe there was love there and they walked off into the sunset together.

 

I'm not here to hate the bakers, even the ones who work , seemingly for the enemies of America.

you might gain a little joy.think of the young married couple who met shilling at a crappy summer job at 8 kun.

doesn't that make you happy.

even a little.

 

no, I have to be your enemy just because I now (only partly) what is going on with the bakers.