Anonymous ID: b8494c Oct. 4, 2020, 11:14 a.m. No.10918303   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>8343

>>10918143

 

>This article was in Notables last night, but now removed…curious???

 

Yea strange huh?

 

attacks will only intensify

infiltration instead of invasion

 

You think the DS, that controls 98% of media, 95% of social media, would not want to control this place? How would they do it?

 

Who have power on this board? BO, CM, Bakers?

 

Bakers are in a position which can be used as a gatekeeping function, controlling what reaches notables by their own agenda. If that agenda is not to work for truth-spreading, then we have an infiltration problem. If they delete notables after the fact, it's even worse.

 

Would be interesting to have Q comment on this situation. Authoritarianism is what we are fighting against here.

 

I don't know which baker has a truth-agenda and which one does not, so not a hit on the current baker, but the situation is clearly being organised in a way that is not beneficial for the purpose of the board itself.