It's not for anyone's benefit
It's also not organic ego-driven bickering between anons, either
It is an extremely tired and over-used shilling tactic:
>First, they "establish" 2 "sides" of bakers. Insert shills on both sides of the debate.
>Start leveling nonstop accusations against the established bakers, usually for dumb shit no anon would really pay attention to or see as a threat
>Use shill inserts to cause small genuine issues with baking to provide fodder for more shilling
>Make tons of noise on both sides of the argument in every bread
>Slide every bread, and create baking confusion when every bread transitions
It's no different than any other shilling protocol. If you aren't wise to it by now, then you either aren't very bright or genuinely haven't been here long. They run the same shit on repeat, over and over and over again.
It always looks the same, sounds the same, has roughly the same amount of "anons" per bread doing it, etc.
The only thing that changes is the context, which currently is "baking"
They switch protocols every few days, and I've seen this "baker controversy" one more times than I can count.
Sharpen the fuck up and ignore the shills, anons