good question anon. There is some discussions on this at >>>/comms/.
>>>/comms/30406
>stop using the terms "signed in baker" or "verified baker" or anything like it.
>reeks of blue checkmark.
>better to make state explicitly that anyone can bake, and you are presenting qbin or pastebin to establish credibility by showing previous bakes. "Signed-in baker" makes it seem like there is nepotism and gatekeeping going on. Maybe say "baker with a history of quality bakes"? idk. Bakers arent above anons obviously and there is no secret discord server or back-room full of cigar smoke and chuckling Establishment Bakers. (I hope not anyway, kek.)
>>>/comms/30410
>This is very important. I am such a fan of this. I want nothing more than that. This should be the goal of comms. I don't know how to make that a reality. But we need to focus on this and making it apparent. The qbin and the avatar, which I love doing, kek. Makes it seem like we are the priests of the temple. Got to show anons our comms. They should be able to see what we're doing here.