dChan
Anonymous ID: 31da7c Oct. 4, 2020, 1:35 p.m. No.10920222   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0253 >>0254 >>0295

>>10919991

I hereby make a claim of /comms/baker subversion

this claim is the foundational reason for the splitting of the bread saturday 10/3

the bread was split for the reason of:

Violation of First Principles

 

First Principle Violated:

-anons not allowed to bake as anon

 

Example 1 of Ongoing Issue

/comms/bakers refuse to handoff to anons

4 /comms/bakers involved in this example (4 unique UID's)

pic related includes 3 of these bakers

would have included 4th but pic related getting too large to digest

 

Bread #13946

/comms/bakers refuse to handoff to anons

anon wasfirst to offerto take bake

/comms/baker 'be' refuses to pass without qbin pre-verification

/comms/bakers proceed to defend brand new baker hand-off pre-verification procedure that was created by these same /comms/bakers

/comms/bakers require anon to selfdox/namefag in order to bake

 

since when are anons not allowed to bake as anon?

 

pic very related

 

input from anons requested

how does this look to you anons?

easy to understand?

is everything sauced?

UIDs → /comms/baker ID's

too big? (what should be removed?)

 

At least 2 more examples of the above are being sauced and proofed

will post when done

 

thank you for (you)r consideration

o7

Anonymous ID: 31da7c Oct. 4, 2020, 1:41 p.m. No.10920295   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0481

>>10920158

>statistical fallacy used to manipulate perceptions

 

>>10919976 example 1

>>10919991 , >>10920155 example 2

>>10920114 example 3

>>10897030 example 4

>>10920222 example 5

 

all I am doing is making proof of this fuckery now

3-4 more proof incomming today

-removed notables

-/comms/bakers spamming /qresearch

-/comms/bakers refusing to handoff to anon

 

stay vigilant anons

see something

say something

screencaps

archive everything offline

 

o7