>>10924119

>Something new probably is coming. And it wont involve them.

I'm not fresh on or thoroughly comprehending the subject, but I know when I've read about it, a damn good case is made that we haven't have a legit president or congress since the Act of 1871. We became a corporation with the limits of DC and the president is a CEO with Congress as Board of Directors? Unconstitutional. This Congress isn't even real, if we wanna get technical about things. Trump is/will be 17th president.? New Congress will be something in the 40's.?

>>10924079

>>10923912

>>10923785

>>10924432

Definitely this.

This has been a standard model all along. Every time they drag Team-Trump thru the mud on some issue, I take it as a sign that he's got [them] on a similar issue x1000, so lets get EVERY screaming voice solidly on the record about how awful it was when he ~did it nowhere near as badly (if at all). Kids in cages, income tax underpayment, mistreating veterans, Melania and Ivanka's private emails, etc ad infinitum.

>>10924472

Old (phony) tweet.

We are watching a movie.

>>10924714

>>10924731

>>10924738

That's maybe the most "I'm not fuckin around" look I've ever seen on his face.