Anonymous ID: 76b35d April 18, 2018, 1:50 p.m. No.1092595   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1092583

Baker,

You're not ONLY looking for pieces to connect for the future. You're supposed to be noting HAPPENINGS, too.

 

And guess, what, if you deny that this is an extreme case of it, then I don't know what to tell you:

https:// youtu.be/liQxGN_RS00

 

Like, what reasoning could you possibly possess to not include it? Please, I'd like to hear it.

Anonymous ID: 76b35d April 18, 2018, 2:13 p.m. No.1092808   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1092787Do you mean the channel all those videos are on?

If so, it's still there.

Regardless, I archived everything so it can be analyzed, but don't know if anyone's taken a shot at it.

Should I be hosting it elsewhere?

 

https:// www.dropbox.com/sh/7tndttafvpkrtnx/AACpJU3VhMu39vAvHRnqGiaxa?dl=0

Anonymous ID: 76b35d April 18, 2018, 2:30 p.m. No.1092956   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3206 >>3207

>>1092897

Not the first time, either, Anon:

https:// www.theverge.com/2016/3/21/11275462/facial-transfer-donald-trump-george-bush-video

 

There's a couple different avenues that they can go with this. The most obvious is that there is a real video coming out and they're planning on using these videos as "proof" that the videos are fabricated, without actually proving anything incorrect.

 

The other avenue is much of the same, but there's an additional step: a false video that's released to the public.

 

The intent, then, would be for the clowns to get everyone to jump on the false video, then release proof that it's fake so that when a real video is released, it's immediately discarded.

 

It is really fucking strange that this is the SECOND video about faking videos from THE SAME SOURCE, (the verge).

 

Additionally, it's really strange that we keep hearing about an "alleged" Hillary video that apparently EVERYONE on the dark web has seen, but NO ONE can provide proof of anything that they're asserting the video contains.

 

Prepare yourself against clowns, Anon. Think critically.

Anonymous ID: 76b35d April 18, 2018, 2:43 p.m. No.1093092   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3154

>>1093054

I'm going to posit that my first sentence isn't bullshit and the reason for that is BECAUSE the clowns have likely been her since the beginning. They've seen what happens with us. They know of the failure of the newsfeed thread and they're trying to push us BACK there.

Anonymous ID: 76b35d April 18, 2018, 2:51 p.m. No.1093177   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1093154

Again, I'm not saying that the ORIGINAL intent of the news boards was to fuck shit up. That was likely a natural occurence that I'm not arguing against.

 

Reread that part several times before you comment further. You're getting too excited. I'm simply saying that the clowns noted how it failed and are now trying to push us back into it, which you agree with.

 

Nor am I saying that you're a clown at all, anon. We're saying almost the same things, but for some reason, you think that I said that the original news thread was started nefariously.