>>10929880

Only what's going on in her case (Guiffre vs Maxwell). Two 'Does' still trying to stay anonnymous.

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4355835/giuffre-v-maxwell/?order_by=desc

>>10930103

Thanks, from you, that's high praise indeed - but you're incorrect on two points.

o7

5:5

>>10930137

Anon asked a queestion, I answered. Why are you attacking anons?

I'm on both breads - one bread team is attacking anons, the other isn't.