This only works if Bread Control Wars stop.. There is no won above another here we are all supposed to be working toward the same goal. Spreading Truth and Keeping Our Country Free. All this bread war crap does is gin animosity..but that is after all the intended goal isn't it, but to what end ? Seriously to what end?
If this nonsense continues there are no winners we all lose. This is not about what bread has the most followers, the better notables, Sight has been lost about what this board is truly about, if we can't have civility here, how are we ever going to help those who don't know everything we know cope with all they are about to hear?
>>>10929835
>
>>if we can't have civility here
>
>it is not civil to alter a previous baker on duties work product
>
>period
You haven't addressed the problem..at all..This isn't about anyone's power, does the ends justify the means..is that your assertion?
>problem
>elaborate
You know I thought I was pretty clear already.. what would you really like me to elaborate on.. because at this point, sound like there is no interest in solving anything.
>If this nonsense continues there are no winners we all lose.
disagree fundamentally with premiss
not about winning or loosing
is about allowing anons to bake as anon
is about continuity of notables
is about refusing to allow edits of previous baker on duties work product
I will not refuse to handoff to anyone
I will operate on first-come first-serve principle
(nice that this can always be confirmed with timestamps)
I have announced I will be seeking handoff around 4-5am PST
Thinking I was quite clear..perhaps I wasn't clear enough. The reference is to the Bread Wars..which seems to me you want to avoid.
>>>10929918
>
>>A place where Anons discuss how to run the Qresearch board
>
>correct
>
>anon discuss how to run the board
>
>on the board
>
>does this sound right and proper to (you) anons?
>
>or
>
>do you think discussion about how to run this board should happen somewhere else?
Why do try to push this in the dark? Open honest discussion for all anons to participate in if they so choose. Otherwise, voices are silenced,.
>Run the board, run the board! More like ruin the board. A bot that creates new threads around post 730 could replace both bakers and the notables that no one seems to read.
You would be surprised how many read the notables.. in addition they are aggregated to the net..
The problem at this point begins and ends with baker wars. Which are entirely built on ego. These wars have set a bad tone for everyone..moar importantly they distract from the fundamental purpose of this board.
>
>Showing their colors/names makes them shills and so we're witnessing shill wars… nothing moar.
>
>If anons want to make a big deal about notables this is always gong to be the case.
>
>Notables aren't endorsements.
>
>If you want to make a name for yourself do it on your own board or platform imo.
>
>i
Interesting ..Not seeing notables mentioned at all in that post??
>>>10930031 (You)
>
>>a bad tone for everyone
>
>without sauce
>
>that is just like
>
>your pinion
>
>man
Thanks for proving the point to original post..You have suggested nothing as a solution to avoid situations like this ..Why is that?
>The problem at this point begins and ends with baker wars. Which are entirely built on ego. These wars have set a bad tone for everyone..moar importantly they distract from the fundamental purpose of this board.
Honestly how does this approach stop the bread from splitting ..hence still baker wars.. looking for amicable ways for the baker wars to end..this approach seems to encourage moar bread splits.
Think about that fact everyday..