Anonymous ID: 63fa08 Oct. 5, 2020, 7:45 a.m. No.10931890   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1977

Saw in the last bred fill, this Kav meme:

>>10931839 (PB)

Reminds me of the exchange he had with Ms. Harris, which is worth a watch. She's a real piece of work, horror show of a VP pick.

Anonymous ID: 63fa08 Oct. 5, 2020, 8:09 a.m. No.10932053   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2070 >>2125 >>2159

>>10931615

On topic of Anonymous Passing between breds. A single-poster anon just dropped this on their COMMS board, and it's nice solution. Been thinking something along these lines for a while (even for when an Anon want to show continuity across breds, perhaps on a slow nightshift, or over time), but this anon buttoned it up. Yes, reeks of namefagging a bit, but far more ephemeral so seems moar ok.

Here is the proposal copy-pasta:

I've got an idea on how to securely handoff, or verify that that the baker from the previous bread is the baker of the new bread to eliminate this current issue.

 

Passphrase: Morning sun brings heat.

 

1) Every baker for every bread takes a known passphrase, and encrypts it using something like https://www.devglan.com/online-tools/aes-encryption-decryption

 

2) Baker uses a new secret key to encrpyt passphrase.

 

3) Baker posts encrypted text in current bread as part of bake [ eurLWBd/6I7Z/OZ7lgogxkzYAAAbwU/ZpooMmgtn1hY= ]

 

3) Baker of new bread posts encrypted text from last bread and secret key to decode into known passphrase.

 

If handing off, New baker encrypts and posts, old baker exposes secret key for current bread. [1234567812345678]

Anonymous ID: 63fa08 Oct. 5, 2020, 8:12 a.m. No.10932085   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10931992

>And it posts another stupid list right below your post.

Yup! Resigned to the fact he/she/its not going away any time soon. Part of the community, filter/ignore or not, it is what it is.

Anonymous ID: 63fa08 Oct. 5, 2020, 8:17 a.m. No.10932127   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2154 >>2160

>>10932070

>No its not. It is not transparent and its not trust able. It instantly has built in distrust. WE arent supposed to be like them.

Go on… Are you saying there isn't a need for bred handoff continuity? So someone doesn't "steal the bake" vs a regular Handoff request and acceptance? How isn't it transparent, when once the passcode is dropped in the new bred, anyone can validate? Mebbe I'm missing something, just trying to pass along ideas that seem to have merit.

 

>>10932002

Read that in their comms tred as well a few mins ago, and agree 100% anon! Perfect example. They're being completely paranoid, calling most real anons shills, building up ghosts in their own minds.

Anonymous ID: 63fa08 Oct. 5, 2020, 8:20 a.m. No.10932160   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10932125

>no

Objection noted, interested to hear any further thoughts / reasoning anon.

See following post for same questions:

>>10932127

> Are you saying there isn't a need for bred handoff continuity? So someone doesn't "steal the bake" vs a regular Handoff request and acceptance? How isn't it transparent, when once the passcode is dropped in the new bred, anyone can validate? Mebbe I'm missing something, just trying to pass along ideas that seem to have merit.

Anonymous ID: 63fa08 Oct. 5, 2020, 8:25 a.m. No.10932204   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2243 >>2282

>>10932154

>Not at all, there has to be a construct. Its just part of what makes every day livable. We all drive on the same side of the road for a reason.

Good metaphor, ty

>THAT construct is not a good one as then we act like them.

What I saw was their coordination of passing off the bake, using comms to do it. Think it good to have open handoffs, right here in the main stream. There can always be shady behind the scenes control. Not sure what to do really, and not a baker, so opinions only..

Anonymous ID: 63fa08 Oct. 5, 2020, 8:55 a.m. No.10932565   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2594

>>10932282

Still responding, as having given it so much energy just to follow the past 5 days, seems worthy to do a post-mortem.

Agree on ALL your points. Well said!

 

>>10932417

>THIS IS WHY WE LANDED OURSELVES HERE IN THE FIRST PLACE! Begging for gatekeepers. Smdh

Fits variety of contexts anon. Enough gatekeeping!

 

>>10932439

>Take the time to read if you can

>Very illuminating, well written and true

Actually read all that over the weekend anon. It was illuminating.

 

>>10932301

>The comms bakers that had half empty abandoned breads all weekend?

kek. Some anon(s) jumped in to drop moldy bread pics with a bot / script (The Man formerly known as OSS said openly he didn't think that was a good idea, but whatev).

So, if not for that, the breds would have been 1/4 full. Ok, I need to step away from the keyboard. Frustrated with the drama and shouldn't be inciting more of it.

 

>>10932268

>go fuck yourself

>>10932320

>thanks for playing asshole

>>10932486

>blow it out your ass faggit

>>10931845

>fuck you

^^ this sort of anger doesn't help the COMMS Krew cause any. It's ok anon, am sure you've invested a lot of personal time, so have skin in the game, so hard to chillax, but try to get a fresh perspective. It's not really that bad.