>This bread is faggot shill.
>Started while three other breads going.
Are you referring to the locked ones? Well, feel free to fill them out.
"we can still convene here until it getz 86'd. don't forget, we have been together for a long time. memes, yo's westies, ra's, be's, cee's and the like. always comms in the stream."
That you guys dont see this very thing is part of the issues and why this has happened is stunning. It is no wonder that your kitchen got infiltrated. Its shameful, shame on all of you.
Just depressing.
>and it's nice solution
No its not. It is not transparent and its not trust able. It instantly has built in distrust. WE arent supposed to be like them.
"Constant attacks on bakers and lots of shills crying "bakers union." Only now they are crying "comms crew" There is no 'comms conspiracy' and we are not shills."
Said in comms…. FFS you are acting like a parody of actual people. That you cannot see what is obvious makes it even more apparent why you are incapable of hearing the simple anon message.
"yes, it's about anons and about the board. it's like that poster of POTUS: shills are not after bakers, they are after the board. Bakers are just in the way."
God complex much free?
>Go on… Are you saying there isn't a need for bred handoff continuity? So someone doesn't "steal the bake" vs a regular Handoff request and acceptance? How isn't it transparent, when once the passcode is dropped in the new bred, anyone can validate? Mebbe I'm missing something, just trying to pass along ideas that seem to have merit.
Not at all, there has to be a construct. Its just part of what makes every day livable. We all drive on the same side of the road for a reason.
THAT construct is not a good one as then we act like them. Anons become excluded and yet again, feel isolated. Even the board on comms is better than that one. But when you have a screeching harpy screaming that nobody should be able to post there if they arent a baker, when they are damned good and well right, THAT is something that triggers anons.
>I remember the war room saying
Fuck wr, those cocksuckers can hang. As well as abcu, leaf and Bob Kraft.
>There can always be shady behind the scenes control. Not sure what to do really, and not a baker, so opinions only..
The fact of life is there is ALWAYS someone somewhere behind some screen. People could always go to comms and see what was being said. Fact of the matter is, they didnt. Most here dont and that is ok.
The issue, to me, is that those over there got very used to not only not being 'seen' but got REALLY comfy with not being challenged. Even those in their own ranks got screamed at for daring to dispute what the all high and mighty NB said. Let alone rusty Those are the things that should be avoided.
NOBODY should trust anybody around here. EVER. Its what keeps the claws sharp and the machine churning. Momentary permission (in a perspective type of way) is all that is granted to those who create any bread. They forgot that.
Anyone who doubts, please feel free to go to comms and just read what is being said about YOU. If you come to a different conclusion, thats ok! However read it anyway because knowledge is power.
Frankly, that is one of the lessons that the man who used to be OSS was trying to convey.
>good bakers do need to be accurate so why no standards or controls?
>worst of both worlds right
Those standards are one of the things that drives a good baker. Its when those standards are in direct opposition to what is commonly accepted is when the issues come in.
>some of them are Jews
>period.
>we've caught them being kikes whilst baking.
>fucking morons never even once acknowledged it.
While I believe I understand the context of what you mean, this is not the way to phrase it in a way that progresses things. Its likely that BO is watching. For him to NOT assume this is nothing more than a game of keep away, then we must act like we actually are controlling the situation. Again, I do not disagree with what I see as your meaning, it is the delivery of that message is all.
>Who will bake, anons?
I will not bake due to the dough being a huge cancer cell. I will however be able from time to time shout out a notable. Before you ask, again, I have voiced my objection and been quite explicit in what I deeply disagree with. It remains and I return to only being anon. It is not in an effort to try any type of rift, it is however what I will allow my efforts to be associated with.
>Just like the Swiss Army. Every anon that can bake must bake at least once.
It cant be enforced. Literally if it was tried to be enforced, you have again become the problem.