>>10932680

>True anon baking, with no verification checks.

Thats how you end up with subversive groups such as WR and abcu as bakers. Its one of the issues that 'they' over there have is that they have been infested. Even with the checks. To remove any way of knowing who has the bread just invites faster corruption. Imagine if we had no idea who our POTUS was. Would it be a leap of faith to believe that some asshat(s) would quickly appear as the POTUS? For conformation proof, look at what happened with the Tea Party movement.

>>10932706

>is this baker v baker BS still going on?

>{{{yawn}}}

>all i see is another slide…

Thank goodness you didnt add to it! Twat

This concept should rustle some jimmies.

(comms)

"The ones who "have" the kitchen right now lack basic human decency. they have no honor or a true service ethic, imo. I am ashamed to see what has transpired. But will remain - and do what I can to be of service"

Says Cap't ethics hisself..