Anonymous ID: 2ce0e4 Oct. 5, 2020, 4:52 p.m. No.10938595   🗄️.is 🔗kun

This bread has notables all the way back to 964 - with non missing.

 

I don't know what that means, exactly, but at least what it tells me is that they're not leaving anything out. But I could be missing something.

Anonymous ID: 2ce0e4 Oct. 5, 2020, 5:03 p.m. No.10938757   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10938709

 

There is no way to tell that I can see, except that this one has whiny assholes complaining.

 

Generally whiny assholes complaining are not the good guys.

Anonymous ID: 2ce0e4 Oct. 5, 2020, 5:04 p.m. No.10938781   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10938756

 

You are the whiny asshole that I was talking about.

 

You're just copying and pasting the same thing.

 

You are not giving any reason at all why there is anything wrong with this bread.

 

But you're being a whiny asshole over and over.

Anonymous ID: 2ce0e4 Oct. 5, 2020, 5:45 p.m. No.10939417   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0183

>>10939144

 

notable.

 

do we like this or dislike this? what's the political angle?

 

CDC generally just makes stuff up as it goes along.

 

People seem to think that whenever there is a "protocol" that following the protocol will mean that you'll get 100% safe. And it really doesn't work like that in the real world.

 

The protocol includes masks, if someone gets covid, they must have not been following the protocol, because they wouldn't have come up with a bullshit list of things to do that don't actually work.

 

CDC seems to be dialing between truthful and simple and easy.