lb >>10936831

Are you sure Wray and Haspel should be Declassing NOW?

keep in mind.

optics are good, we do not want GH or CW to be perceived as listening to trump.

Clowns have the most power and resources globally, much moar with human intel and business, and gray/blackmarket than DIA.

Remember Potus used clowns to 187 solomeini.

a potus greatest tool by far, much moar the DOS and DIA is limited outside certain scope.

C_A Ops can be easily compartmentalized by Potus so yes he maximizes them fully, they have a long and tested legal predicate for doing illegal shit that needs to be done, and are above congress oversight in most cases, because simply things do not exist, state secrets or no doc Ops.

NOW THE BOOMER:

1- When we declass crimes are exposed, Yes, but evidence also is revealed, actual evidence and sources and methods to a degree where defendants can figure out what prosecutors really have e.g., level of surveil, nsa, Treasury (Swift), if docs that people think were hidden (SAP, State secrets, black Ops, Contractor Ops) show up in declass it changes the GAME (literally).

2- A prosecutor does not always give a GJ all the evidence, they give enough to make an indictment.

A prosecutor can keep the evidence not given to a GJ fully hidden (evidence given to a GJ will be known, too many people have access, and it often is electronically transfered and filed). At the level of defendants Potus is dealing with count on them gaining access.

3- So just like flynn, evidence needed to free him was being used by a GJ.

Think evidence being used a prosecutor should not/cannot be declassed often times, because a prosecutor can use that as a card to play.

A defendant may not want to cooperate or may want to plead not guilty, that we need to cooperate to inform about others crimes. I believe that habbened with Clinesmith, he was thinking of pleading non guilty until some evidence was shown that was pretty strong, so we got cooperation.

4- Once evidence is shown to one defendant in a conspiracy as we have, the lawyers will likely notify others who may or may not be indicted, so that aides their defense, also the DS when evidence is known Will counter it one way or another with fake news, fake intel, etc. etc.

5- Declass is or makes evidence known and allows people to be prepped for what is to come.

6- Discovery is the earliest that a defendant has a legal right to see the evidence against him or her. That habbens after a plea.

7- Why would we want to reveal evidence Now with declass, before people are indicted and before they plea, it weakens the prosectors position and options.

8- Me think declass of substantial things now is bad, we may win public opinion/awareness, but at the risk of weakening criminal cases.

not a lawfag but this is my opinion of game theory, and is generally accurate as a overview