==Storm Signals=
>>10925250 noted a possible decode of the marker for The Storm. A complex POTUS tweet decode gave "My fellow Americans, the Storm is upon us." Tweet date was 10/2, suggesting Storm start 10/2.
Today a simpler decode appeared: English ordinal of a POTUS tweet video title matches the same marker. Tweet date was 10/2, again suggesting Storm start 10/2.
-
>>10925250 also noted a possible highlight of Q drop 104. A gematria scheme suggested Storm operations ongoing on 10/4.
Now >>10931452 notes recurring images in mil tweets, 3 times showcasing the destroyer Sterett (DDG 104). This also points to Q drop 104. Tweets were posted 10/3, 10/4, and 10/5, suggesting Storm operations 10/3-10/5, consistent with above.
-
Possibly.
-
The ambiguity of plausible deniability leaves so many decodes uncertain. Will it always be like that? Or, when The Storm is over, will Q release a set ofauthoritative decoding methods, to open and delimit the Storm comm archive?
I think in future the public would be very grateful for an authoritative decrypted Storm archive, much as historians today appreciate Pentagon releases of significant decrypted WWII comms.
Image: Storm librarian, 21st century.