Anonymous ID: 042704 Oct. 5, 2020, 9:49 p.m. No.10942185   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2240

>>10942104

I see you're missing a piece of this dig from 2018.

Was this you? If so, great work. Was a big fan of this discussion back then. Twas a notable contribution in it's time, and maybe ahead of it's time, nowadays. At any rate, it proves that anons were still anons, long ago, at least.