still going on with the bfaker drama?
you say 'oh here is what happened'
what I saw was a script run by a few people to make it look like a war to cause havoc, and madeup characters intentinally designed to confuse.
you have no sauce for your 'sit by or . . . ' tact of argument.
more taskmaster shill push to try to make people get frustrated and abandon Q.
blind
there is no 'them' it's a 'he'.
the conflict is a script.
OSS is a made up character, created recently.
it's all the same people on both sides of the conflict.
It's designed to cause havoc.
look at you, you say a bland statement with no object, and I say 'blind' and you say 'you are one of them'
one of 'who'?
Quotes Jesus, but . . . well tries to exclude someone based upon merely the evidence of being challanged.
assumes the 'owner ship' form of 'we'.
Yes, I'll keep going. you have no water.
you are a dry well.
you read the inscriptions, but you have no idea what they mean.
when you finally run away, will you be naked ike St Luke as he ran off, cowardly, away from those who went to arrest Jesus?
you quote the stuff, but you don't know the story.
do good to those who hate you, anon.
so for someone like me, who doesn't hate you, you'd let me die of thirst (so your analogy goes).
on and the 'if we'
who 'we'?
what we are you talking about?
anon: this kind of faker will be here all day pretending to holyness but actually here to curse and condemn. Quoting scripture, wiht no spirit of scripture, and plotting against them ignoring the idea of 'do good to your enemies'.
and I'm not even an enemie.
ya, people will go on all day. And they will counter and tell you that you are a fake, because you do seem to be.
now find some scripture that you don't really understand and quote it and hide behind it like a coward, while you plot the pogrom for all the anon who come here and expect the bakers to be in the background as fellow servants.
you probably don't even know what that reference is.
I don't believe that OSS is anything more than a made up name used to make it seem like there is conflict.
no one has shown me otherwise.
and then to have people attacking for merely behaving the same as always and acting like I'm an enemy.
you think that's OK?
quoteing Luke, without understanding Luke.
being antichristian while pretending to of Spirit.
not living and let living.
and trying to cause division and conflict.
Did I tag you, no?
and yet you act like I think you are guilty?
how would I know?
but again, the conflict script is on going.
Mabye youy don't participate, but some of the bakers do.
so you choose to attack me instead of just seeing what I'm saying, and take sides with a person, who in a very unchristian way, talks about me in the third person like if I'm here in the bread with your 'gawd people' I'm a prisoner who can be derided and spoken of as if I'm a captive.
pepole see it, baker. And they know what that is about.
and you acting like I attacked you personally with your 'I know OSS'
how could you?
we are supposed to be anon.
whe supposed OSS did was name fag, didn't he.
and that's OK by you?
no one is fooled baker, by any of this.
I say contriversial things and get hassled.
what are you doing?
taking sides when seriously you should just be baking.
there we go.
they show their non christian nature.
you are reading off a script, anon.
or you could augment your shill-posts with scripts, that you run in IP hopped processes.
so offended by being challanaged and saying 'fuck you.'
if you are a baker you aren't supposed to do that.
but that doesn't matter to you and your team , who either have you as their mind-thrall, or pay you to be here.
it's OLD script reader, it's old and you are causing problems by being part of it.
what you do is not anon behavior, but glory hounding famefag behavior.
and you take offense at a little criticism presented as hyperbolic commentary.
so ya, us oldphags are going to tell you to back off.
back off.
well I concor with the one below.
but listen, you who was 'only going to do this once', I'm not telling you to not bake. Nor am I telling you that the bread is bad. I'm saying 'you don't act like a baker.'
PS: there is no way to get anon to 'vote' that has any meaning here.
when you bake, just bake.
don't spurge the bread with your opinions, or take sides with the fake battles that you find when you get here.
no one cares why you are here, this is a free speech board. however, as baker, you have a role. you violate the spirit of being a baker by being part of what, for my view, is a scripted (not all robot process) conflict.
a 'play' has a 'script'.
and a 'program for a computer' can also be called a 'script' (usually interpreted code, as uppossed to compiled code).
so me saying 'scripted' doesn't say you are an AI, it says you are following along with a script!
am I wrong? fine. tell me. I'll accept that.
I challange you, you challange me, we aren't here to kill each other.
I concur with you. This baker doesn't understand that no poll is valid here, and wants a 'vote' where no fair one can be made!
TY, they sometimes seem willful in what they do in these breads lately.
being calmer, but persistent, is the better tactic.
from my point of veiw
the biggest biggots and racists are those who accuse everyone else of it.
and that spurge term you use applies to all haters, not just those against a particular group.
you use their talking points, and have that whole 'biggest A. . . S . . . . ' crap, which shows you as a marxist partisan . . . so . . . I suggest that people ignore you and do not take your point of veiw as useful.
you imagine the crime, and paste it on those who you want to put in the gulog.
that has nothing to do with harmony between peple, but is a sick and twisted kind of ethnodominant behavior.
many are very tired of that kind of name calling, but they won't tell you to your face because they don't want to be sucker punched by a bully.
British shill for his midday putdown session.
you were here yesterday badgering people too.
you know who I am, is my guess.
you use terms that most of the world says 'huh?'
spurge shill, wow, you put this evidence of your spurging depravity.
the accusation and constant badger that the bigot does is the worst kind of bigotry.
partisans who make the constant accusation of bigotry, are the worste kind of bigots.
they accuse of a fake crime, the call you as a member of a group you are not part of, they suggest you got to the gulog.
if there were a real gulog and they could send you there, they would do it. Or just punch you in the face and knife you on the street and call you by a slur like they do at Marxist demonstrations.
PS: the oldest continuous community of Jews in the West lives where?
what city?
where they are loved and protected?
your robot postings are obvious hatebot nonsense.
the one who makes the constant accusation of hate against 'his kind' is the one who causes the most trouble for 'his kind' by being what he says everyone else is, only against, not for.
Its too obvious when you glow this much no one ever takes you seriously anon.
good people don't spurge accusttions of bigotry with such scant evidence as you provide.
instead what you do is to try to stoke the flames of hate so you can keep the hate hot and always on people's minds.
it's sub behavior, someone with no self esteam, grabbing on to ethnic talking points wihtout realy understanding the concepts, and that it isn't an 'us in them' in the mannor you suggest.
how would it make anyone feel?
you live in a world where a group who are supposedly the 'smartest' devolve into a namecalling 'j'accuse' mode and want to throw anyone who troubles them into a gulog and murder strangers over politics.
I don't think 'feelings' matter.
you treat them in a clinical way.
I explain what they do and hope tht they look in a mirror.
my feelings?
sad, I suppose.
but it wouldn't be there if I faced this kind in a public venue. I'd get away from them as soon as they started in with the 'U are a . . . ' bit.
what about you?
what does bigoted ethnic supremicist nonsense make you feel like when it's directed at you in a bread and you are in 'comment' mode and just typing and not expecting a barrage of hatred?
it's sucky.
but if we don't do it the bread gets dominated by crap.
I can deflect, and others can post.
I can't do this all day, obviously.
sometimes my fingers ache.
that makes me feel like I've dones something.
but that's not what you're asking.
my argument against the test would simply be that I had nose surgery once, and I don't trust that they know what will happen if they shove a swab up my nose, so Pass.
or I might get a sudden nose bleed and have to go into emergency surgery.
and they'd would have to be liabel if that happened.
they would refuse to give me the test then, most likely.
17 post 'herder' shill trying to sway opinion by using pictures of children as a prop.
doesn't bother to read or understand but just attacks.
no one is fooled by this kind of thing.
note: most anon are not posting their memes because the mean-bitch team uses those to 'know' who you are.
It has been suggested that one never post the same meme twice.
here in this bread, so that the shill teams can't trace you to other breads.
I agree that old memes are often very appropo.
may the story not be analogous to 'the emperor's new apprentice' with the agency as the broom.
insertion shill
inserts and uses accusations to intimidate.
projects their anger that someone here is thinking and posting, but isn't in terror of the thought police.
your post would apply to yourself, except it's a hurtful word.
the term to use for you?
"insertion conflict shill"
shill fail
you made me laugh heartily!