>>10944958 tyb
Does the Title indicate your'e a virgin baker?
>Thanks for the help, would have used them if I caught them, repost or whatevs, I won't be here much longer
See this bread:
Could always update the dough if you're not planning to stick around, so new baker doesn't have to worry about 'changing past notables', even though you already suggested you'd have used them if you saw that.
Good day to you fren.
ID: ee54c8
Anon, might have the patterns LB and ThisBred off, but are you PB: ID 11fb16 (19)
the one who call ID: 66626e (clearly a real anon)
>>10944701 (PB)
>insertion shill
>inserts and uses accusations to intimidate.
>projects their anger that someone here is thinking and posting, but isn't in terror of the thought police.
>your post would apply to yourself, except it's a hurtful word.
>the term to use for you?
>"insertion conflict shill"
>shill fail
Got all aggressive, angry, paranoid, accusatory, and at the same time all BibleFag on 1/2 your posts, all holier than thou?
A disgruntled CrewBaker?
Now just attacking this bred's baker? Belittling?
Given you know your Bible, you do know how much God hates a hypocrite, right??
>so might as well step up.
Wish I could do the same now anon. ty very much! Hats off to you Baker.
Peace and good will to you today anon. WWG1WGA!
>Just doing what I can for anons.
Observed and appreciated anon.
>>10945247 ty baker pro.
>>10945264 and for the tunage fren
>>10945351 ty gb
If the (3) contracted at the Rose Garden event, and were in the Press section, could be interdasting.
Would give credence for a source that started around there and blew along toward the others in the front row (and POTUS).
Could help zero in on the source.
Nice, that'll get everyone's heart pumping with the adrenaline rush, drivers to protesters. Good thing the landwhale did go down, wouldn't have passed cleanly even with all that clearance (let alone the trailer).