So let me get this straight:

>Trump promotes HCQ as treatment for Covid

>Media shits all over HCQ

>Trump gets Covid

>Instead of taking HCQ himself, Trump takes retardsivir, the $2000 a dose treatment, thus ensuring to prove the media right about HCQ and continuing the rape of America by big pharma.

Instead he could have destroyed both the media, and big pharma, had he only taken the treatment he himself backed, along with Q.

Qtards will see no problem with the above anal dilation they just received from Trump and Q.

Let's see if anyone has a rational argument against this.

>>10946543

It's too late now. If he tries to say HydroxyCloroquine cured him, they will simply say it was Redemsvir, and or the other experimental medicine he had.

It's all so tiresome. He had the killshot. If you are a true patriot you do not solely, and blindly back someone who is screwing you over, and close your eyes to all he does. We're not democrats for fucks sake.

>>10946767

Please be right.

>>10946654

Projection is strong with you.

Please address the specifics of my point. Simply stating I have a flawed assumption is not an argument.

>>10946892

Ah so this is not a tremendous missed opportunity?

This is just more 5d chess right?

Not standing behind the treatment he himself pushed feels like winning right?

I guess I should apologize for wanting a president that backs his words with actions.

Silly me thinking I had a point there.