>>10947698

>I support anons, but not you. I want anons to bake anytime they want to. Even if they need help and don't wanna go off-board to do it or namefag. (You) are divisionfag. No better than your average shill at this point.

Concur anon. Just jumping back in and saw this right away.

We've got two ID's:

c5968b (16) currently

and bcc597 (29)

My guess at this point, is the JIDF or whatever group of shills, saw the division between the original OOS (anon formerly known as.. Likely why he dropped the persona) and the Baker Crew in Comms. Thinking they then took on that persona to carry on the division.

Not falling for it. (pic related)

I support the Comms crew (in general), just have an issue with them being completely arrogant members of the fight, who at this point haven't shown the least bit of respect for Anons.

Am wise to this now. No division from me. But, do support new bakers (such as Virgin Baker this morning, who was lambasted and belittled by Comms crew, save one who remained Anon and stood up to actually lend a helping hand).

As wakes said in Comms "enough". I agree, enough, let's recognize that the original good intent by former OSSanon, has now been highjacked by shills, and we move on, together, in this fight, to the finish.

Have a good day anons. ..fellow Anon.

>>10947897

>Virgin Baker this morning was a comms baker pretending, and had you been reading comms instead of writing in it you'd know that.

Oh really? Why when Ra took the bread they said we "have it back"? Why wakes dropped mold into his bred?

Anon, youre mistaken - go read again, back to DreamTime for you (and no, that's not me).

>>10947948

>I helped virgin baker this morning. Bakers have to learn the hard way, just like anyone else. If they agree to be moar respectful and let anons bake without verifying or going to class, board should be able to proceed.

Guud on you anon, respect!

>>10947615 read it the same.

Not a division shill either, just an anon, and happy to get back to work.