>>10948157 (PB)
hmmm
where have I seen these kind of caps before?!?!?
[Moldy Bread Campaign]
comms/baker frebe-freebaker-GYB
>>10948157 (PB)
hmmm
where have I seen these kind of caps before?!?!?
[Moldy Bread Campaign]
comms/baker frebe-freebaker-GYB>>10948875
>why are you attacking a bake with the fucking bomb threat stupid drama shit in global notables
because you removed links from that global that had the complete sauce
I baked the full list, thats how I know
complete list of global notable links:
>>10938666, >>10935072, >>10934961, >>10938775, >>10941843, >>10941953, >>10941979, >>10942015 Updated Comms Bomb threat graphic showing how they also planted
why did you edit out the links, baker?
>why are you attacking a bake with the fucking bomb threat stupid drama shit in global notables
because you removed links from that global that had the complete sauce
I baked the full list, thats how I know
complete list of global notable links:
>>10938666, >>10935072, >>10934961, >>10938775, >>10941843, >>10941953, >>10941979, >>10942015 Updated Comms Bomb threat graphic showing how they also planted
why did you edit out the links, baker?
>Why have double bread for the last several days? New shill tactic? What's going on? I've been away for a few days.
this is why
I hereby make a claim of /comms/baker subversion
this claim is the foundational reason for the splitting of the bread saturday 10/3
the bread was split for the reason of:
Violation of First Principles
First Principle Violated:
-anons not allowed to bake as anon
Example 1 of Ongoing Issue
/comms/bakers refuse to handoff to anons
4 /comms/bakers involved in this example (4 unique UID's)
pic related includes 3 of these bakers
would have included 4th but pic related getting too large to digest
Bread #13946
/comms/bakers refuse to handoff to anons
anon wasfirst to offerto take bake
/comms/baker 'be' refuses to pass without qbin pre-verification
/comms/bakers proceed to defend brand new baker hand-off pre-verification procedure that was created by these same /comms/bakers
/comms/bakers require anon to selfdox/namefag in order to bake
since when are anons not allowed to bake as anon?
pic very related
input from anons requested
how does this look to you anons?
easy to understand?
is everything sauced?
UIDs → /comms/baker ID's
too big? (what should be removed?)
At least 2 more examples of the above are being sauced and proofed
will post when done
thank you for (you)r consideration
o7
and things like this:
/comms/ baker frebe spamms board with [Moldy Bready Campaign]
and things like this:
/comms/ bakers put a bomb threat in the middle of new article text in attempt to frame anon bakers
the links below WERE in Global Notables
/comms/bakers have removed these links from Global Notables
Censorship?
>>10938666,
>>10935072,
>>10934961,
>>10938775,
^All Removed from Gloabl Notables by /comms/ bakers^
>as soon as the baker has >15 posts we should fork the bake.
so you can shill the baker with a 3 prong attack
making ridiculous claims to sway anon opinion
and if baker evenattemptsto refute
then you get to split the bread?
becuase baker made to many posts?
that is FUCKING kekworthy
>free speach board
>bakers can only make 10 posts
…riiiiiiiight…
please keep trying
this is fun
then do that when (you) bake
what makes you think you get to dictate
toanyother anon
what they should be doing with their free will
iswaybeyond my logic
>it's the standard all bakers should be measured by, and if some disciplined anons
keep trying to manufacture concensus
anons know
all of the keks
(you) would want anon on big pharma medications wouldnt you?
maybe some nice anti-psychotics?
and a friendly "therapist" to go with?
kindly go KYS
>trying to keep shills from getting the bake
futile and uneccesary
its think kind of thinking that got us to the bread war we find ourselves in
>its this** kind
>Anons will solve the comms baker problem, the notables problem and QResearch will be awesome again.
czeqq'd
dubz confirm
anons know
all is right in the chans
is this not getting notabled anon?
>no way of knowing who is who
by their fruits
using your discerment
exactly as Q taught us
you dont need BO to gatekeep for you, friend
think for yourself
>people keep asking for an explanation, anon.
5:5
probably should have read the whole reply threead >.<
feeling very /comfy/ with all these anons knowing
>Honestly, look at last night's breads, Freddy note-takered.
this
I am anon baker from those breads
I will always let freddy note for me
and I will always handoff to freddy if he is taking
baker???
ANYONE BAKERING?