Anonymous ID: c92799 Oct. 6, 2020, 2:55 p.m. No.10951715   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1836

>>10951320

Q give us a drop proving Facebook Twitter and others are/were taking direction from a high level Government official so you can file a classaction suit. We could get an immediate injunction with proof Gvernment directed them to stiffle oposing speech

Anonymous ID: c92799 Oct. 6, 2020, 2:59 p.m. No.10951796   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1893

Q, Service providers ( utilites) are giving platform to Social Media sites free. If people are banned arbitrarioy like this, Can't they demand Facebook Twitter and others be removed from services like AT&T, Verizon, and smaller utilites?

Anonymous ID: c92799 Oct. 6, 2020, 3:04 p.m. No.10951877   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2035

>>10951836 If linkage to the House resolution condemning us can be made then it is the government, therefore a civil right's violation. It may also be others but that is irrelevant. lawfag jr.

Anonymous ID: c92799 Oct. 6, 2020, 3:18 p.m. No.10952109   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10951893

they may ultimateky be owned by one but they re different. Utilities cannot legally charge 2 people the same price but proved partial service to only 1 of them and full service to the other. Meaning, AT&T cannot allow social media to ban 1 of their customers and not another. If that occurs then they have to remove that social media as part of their basic service