>>10950792

>and funny how ZERO Bakers wanted anything to do with the Inthematrixxx>Alex Jones Connection even though it was a very well researched 5 part dig.

and odd how Wakes does that shit with 3 month old inthematrixxx spewage Payseur

and bizarre how OSS defends P = payseur as if his pay check depended on it.

and what a coincidence that that one Anon/faker taker makes all those "matrixxxy" memage that he always tries to get Q'ed so hard!

>>very well researched 5 part dig.>>

PuHLEASE

do you call yourself a digger? have u really dug on any of that crap?

so much energy spent on that?

dudddddddddddde. that is just sad.

and the way he glows……..when they are driving the narrative in here. Cant you see-no one is buying that

==very well researched 5 part dig=

the matrixxx derangement syndrome is bright in this one causing mo' glo per square inch….

>>10952817

oh lookie…the globug is here.i thought that was u. the "researcher" ow ow ow- but you are the one that i was talking to ..

never seen any real research from u. just a narrative. just a narrative-thats all u get paid to do. drop the bs and hope some newbie takes your bait. Quite the master-baiter, aren't u.

Lookie there- now that was some real logical thinking, in case u didnt recognize it, being a researcher & all.

a sissy-fried glow bug………

playing the 'concernfag' role.