>>10938666, >>10935072, >>10934961, >>10938775 __Updated Comms Bomb threat graphic showing how they also planted
THIS GLOBAL NOTABLE SHOULD BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY!!
NO ANON HAS THE RIGHT TO BEAR FALSE WITNESS AGAINST PATRIOT BAKERS LONG IN SERVICE TO THIS BOARD
= = = = =
THERE IS ZERO EVIDENCE OF A LINK BETWEEN BOMB THREAT POST IN /QR/ and BAKER DISCUSSION IN /COMMS/
UPDATED
Background:
-
OSS threatened 3 bakers - DSB, GB and GYB/FRB - in QR #13992 (https://archive.vn/wip/QMmdr)
-
Created a confusing cap consisting of a a mish-mosh of timestamps and comments between DSB and GB to try to "prove" that the two were plotting to post a bomb threat on /qr/. >>>/qresearch/10937202.
-
Does not say why the bakers were doing this, but the implication is that they are and have always been shills masquerading as bakers, so they could sabotage qresearch.
[- How amazing that they should post this bomb threat at precisely the time that OSS is watching their actions - what are the chances of that??]
-
OSS and shills started spamming the idea all over /qr/ that /comms/ bakers are making bomb threats.
-
Also posted it on /comms/, see: >>>/comms/31036
-
Nobody has refuted this destructive claim, so it continues to circulate. Shills and OSS taking full advantage.
Findings:
-
Upon investigation, it is clear that there is ZERO evidence to support the idea that there's any connection between the bomb threat post and bakers' conversation on /comms/.
-
Timestamps don't match up - see below
-
Convo is not about mail bombs but about why OSS crew is attacking the kitch when it did (on a weekend)- see below
Conclusion:
OSS just juxtaposed a bunch of unrelated stuff OUT OF CONTEXT and then made the outrageous claim it showed bakers planning a mail bomb post
this is a totally SPECIOUS claim based on ZERO evidence
Done SOLELY to discredit traditional baking crew in order to institute a COUP by "No Name" bakers
("No Name" bakers had names as recently as last week - "No Name" is just a power grab tactic)
Details:
Let's compare the action on /qr/ with the convo on /comms/.
IN__ /QR/__:
0:56 - guy posts on qr with an article on mandatory masks followed by a post with somewhat dank jokey-sounding bomb threat because he's upset about the possibility of mandated masks with very harsh penalties for non-compliance.
1:42 - anon in /qr/ notices a bomb threat in notables and comments in red text (which baker notices and so deletes the notable)
at some point, the bomb threat post is submitted as Global Report and removed from the bread.
IN /COMMS/:
(''Bolded statements'' in convo were the only ones that appeared in OSS post described below. SO THE OSS POST TOOK THE CONVO COMPLETELY OUT OF CONTEXT. Typical tactic for him.)
0:27 >>>/comms/30617 : GB - "just set the bait"
0:38 >>>/comms/30619 : DSB - "Think they'll be gone in the morning?"
0:44 >>>/comms/30620 : BE - "No [then describes DS panic].
0:47 >>>/comms/30621 : GB - "Dey took it. Likely to continue but with sporatic breaks."
0:49 >>>/comms/30624 : BE - "how r you cakes?"
0:49 >>>/comms/30625 : DSB - "be, quite drinking for now eat something, your mind will clear, i swear"
0:54 >>>/comms/30628 : DSB - "during the week they will have a hard way to go and moar anons to put up with"
0:57 >>>/comms/30633 : GB - "perhaps which is why it was set-up for weekend. Just a small little trap, not a big deal.
the reasonable I'm going to provide an incomplete summation of what habbened last year shill outed.
1:06 >>>/comms/30635 : DSB - "Appreciate you, hopin it works"
1:06 >>>/comms/30636 : GB - "The moldy shit bred is at a crawl"
1:13 >>>/comms/30638 : DSB - "I'm watchin the catalog naow"
1:34 >>>/comms/30642 : DSB - "…kbee shuttin it down"
1:37 >>>/comms/30644 : GB - "not yet, workin on the faggit posting stale notables, the big push failing"
posts made by OSS on comms /bakers meta/ thread when the conversations took place - meant to threaten and mock the bakers there. see >>>/comms/31036 for all three posts.
NOTE: GB posted on his conversation, noting that the reference to a trap was about triggering OSS crew with a post having his GB's initials - a tactic he felt was successful; see >>>/comms/31273
= = = = =
OSS says this conversation shows that DSB and GB were planning a mail bomb threat post based on two things:
1 - two statements in their convo (the bolded ones)
2 - very loose but out-of-order links to timestamps
But the statements in context don't show any such intent. And the timestamps on the threat post in /qr/ DO NOT MATCH UP with the convo.
CAP 1 shows OSS's confusing post that tries to use a few random statements by bakers combined with time stamps that don't match up w/convo to "prove" that the two are related.
What we see is this: when looked at in context, the ''the conversation is about why OSS crew is trying to take over the bake on the weekend and bakers' efforts to stop them.''
GB's comment is about it "being set up for weekend" is about OSS' effort to take over the dough,not planning a bomb threat.
CAP 2 shows QR #13992 bread posts where OSS tries to frame and intimidate bakers, implying he can prove they have been making bomb threats.
CAP 3 shows one of the posts made by OSS on comms /bakers meta/ thread when the conversations took place - meant to threaten and mock the bakers there. see >>>/comms/31036 for all three posts.