>>10957519 pb
baker
10.06.2020
should be
Tuesday 10.06.2020
thought you'd eventually see it but you're obviously too busy with adding or retaining posts for that TOTALLY FALSE Global Notable to notice
as long as that Global remains in the bread, this anon will continue to call it out as a TOTAL FUKKING FAILURE unworthy of what we do on this board.
Take it out right now
the following post has been nominated NOTABLE
but been ignored as far as i know because OS who claims to be against censorship is anything but. So all i can do is to keep reposting. Please read carefully and judge for yourselves.
>>10938666, >>10935072, >>10934961, >>10938775 __Updated Comms Bomb threat graphic showing how they also planted
THIS GLOBAL NOTABLE SHOULD BE REMOVED
NO ANON HAS THE RIGHT TO BEAR FALSE WITNESS AGAINST PATRIOT BAKERS LONG IN SERVICE TO THIS BOARD
= = = = =
THERE IS ZERO EVIDENCE OF A LINK BETWEEN BOMB THREAT POST IN /QR/ and BAKER DISCUSSION IN /COMMS/
UPDATED
Background:
OSS threatened 3 bakers - DSB, GB and GYB/FRB - in QR #13992 (https://archive.vn/wip/QMmdr)
Created a confusing cap consisting of a a mish-mosh of timestamps and comments between DSB and GB to try to "prove" that the two were plotting to post a bomb threat on /qr/. >>>/qresearch/10937202.
Does not say why the bakers were doing this, but the implication is that they are and have always been shills masquerading as bakers, so they could sabotage qresearch.
[- How amazing that they should post this bomb threat at precisely the time that OSS is watching their actions - what are the chances of that??]
OSS and shills started spamming the idea all over /qr/ that /comms/ bakers are making bomb threats.
Also posted it on /comms/, see: >>>/comms/31036
Nobody has refuted this destructive claim, so it continues to circulate. Shills and OSS taking full advantage.
Findings:
Upon investigation, it is clear that there is ZERO evidence to support the idea that there's any connection between the bomb threat post and bakers' conversation on /comms/.
Timestamps don't match up - see below
Convo is not about mail bombs but about why OSS crew is attacking the kitch when it did (on a weekend)- see below
Conclusion:
OSS just juxtaposed a bunch of unrelated stuff OUT OF CONTEXT and then made the outrageous claim it showed bakers planning a mail bomb post
this is a totally SPECIOUS claim based on ZERO evidence
Done SOLELY to discredit traditional baking crew in order to institute a COUP by "No Name" bakers
("No Name" bakers had names as recently as last week - "No Name" is just a power grab tactic)
Details:
Let's compare the action on /qr/ with the convo on /comms/.
IN__ /QR/__:
0:56 - guy posts on qr with an article on mandatory masks followed by a post with somewhat dank jokey-sounding bomb threat because he's upset about the possibility of mandated masks with very harsh penalties for non-compliance.
1:42 - anon in /qr/ notices a bomb threat in notables and comments in red text (which baker notices and so deletes the notable)
at some point, the bomb threat post is submitted as Global Report and removed from the bread.
IN /COMMS/:
(''Bolded statements'' in convo were the only ones that appeared in OSS post described below. SO THE OSS POST TOOK THE CONVO COMPLETELY OUT OF CONTEXT. Typical tactic for him.)
0:27 >>>/comms/30617 : GB - "just set the bait"
0:38 >>>/comms/30619 : DSB - "Think they'll be gone in the morning?"
0:44 >>>/comms/30620 : BE - "No [then describes DS panic].
0:47 >>>/comms/30621 : GB - "Dey took it. Likely to continue but with sporatic breaks."
0:49 >>>/comms/30624 : BE - "how r you cakes?"
0:49 >>>/comms/30625 : DSB - "be, quite drinking for now eat something, your mind will clear, i swear"
0:54 >>>/comms/30628 : DSB - "during the week they will have a hard way to go and moar anons to put up with"
0:57 >>>/comms/30633 : GB - "perhaps which is why it was set-up for weekend. Just a small little trap, not a big deal.
the reasonable I'm going to provide an incomplete summation of what habbened last year shill outed.
1:06 >>>/comms/30635 : DSB - "Appreciate you, hopin it works"
1:06 >>>/comms/30636 : GB - "The moldy shit bred is at a crawl"
1:13 >>>/comms/30638 : DSB - "I'm watchin the catalog naow"
1:34 >>>/comms/30642 : DSB - "…kbee shuttin it down"
1:37 >>>/comms/30644 : GB - "not yet, workin on the faggit posting stale notables, the big push failing"
posts made by OSS on comms /bakers meta/ thread when the conversations took place - meant to threaten and mock the bakers there. see >>>/comms/31036 for all three posts.
NOTE: GB posted on his conversation, noting that the reference to a trap was about triggering OSS crew with a post having his GB's initials - a tactic he felt was successful; see >>>/comms/31273
= = = = =
OSS says this conversation shows that DSB and GB were planning a mail bomb threat post based on two things:
1 - two statements in their convo (the bolded ones)
2 - very loose but out-of-order links to timestamps
But the statements in context don't show any such intent. And the timestamps on the threat post in /qr/ DO NOT MATCH UP with the convo.
CAP 1 shows OSS's confusing post that tries to use a few random statements by bakers combined with time stamps that don't match up w/convo to "prove" that the two are related.
What we see is this: when looked at in context, the ''the conversation is about why OSS crew is trying to take over the bake on the weekend and bakers' efforts to stop them.''
GB's comment is about it "being set up for weekend" is about OSS' effort to take over the dough,not planning a bomb threat.
CAP 2 shows QR #13992 bread posts where OSS tries to frame and intimidate bakers, implying he can prove they have been making bomb threats.
CAP 3 shows one of the posts made by OSS on comms /bakers meta/ thread when the conversations took place - meant to threaten and mock the bakers there. see >>>/comms/31036 for all three posts.
Tavistock and the OSS
Tavistock - The Best Kept Secret In America
Source: CTRL http://ctrl.org
TAVISTOCK INSTITUTE
30 Tabernacle Street
London EC2A 4DD
Formed in 1947, the Tavistock Institute is an independent not-for-profit organization which seeks to combine research in the social sciences with professional practice. Problems of institution-building and organizational design and change are being tackled in all sectors - government, industry and commerce, health and welfare, education, etc. - nationally and internationally, and clients range from multinationals to small community groups. A growth area has been the use of a developmental approach to evaluation of new and experimental programs, particularly in health, education and community development. This has also produced new training events alongside the regular program of group relations conferences. The Institute owns and edits the monthly journal Human Relations (published by Plenum Press) which is now in its 48th year, and has recently launched (in conjunction with Sage Publications) a new journal Evaluation.
The ideology of American foundations was created by the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations in London. In 1921, the Duke of Bedford, Marquess of Tavistock, the 11th Duke, gave a building to the Institute to study the effect of shellshock on British soldiers who survived World War I. Its purpose was to establish the "breaking point" of men under stress, under the direction of the British Army Bureau of Psychological Warfare, commanded by Sir John Rawlings-Reese.
Tavistock Institute is headquartered in London. Its prophet, Sigmond Freud, settled in Maresfield Gardens when he moved to England. He was given a mansion by Princess Bonaparte. Tavistock's pioneer work in behavioral science along Freudian lines of "controlling" humans established it as the world center of foundation ideology. Its network now extends from the University of Sussex to the U.S. through the Stanford Research Institute, Esalen, MIT, Hudson Institute, Heritage Foundation, Center of Strategic and International Studies at Georgetown, where State Dept. personal are trained, US Air Force Intelligence, and the Rand and Mitre corporations. The personnel of the corporations are required to undergo indoctrination at one or more of these Tavistock controlled institutions. A network of secret groups, the Mont Pelerin Society, Trilateral Commission, Ditchley Foundation, and the Club of Rome is conduit for instructions to the Tavistock network.
Tavistock Institute developed the mass brain-washing techniques which were first used experimentally on American prisoners of war in Korea. Its experiments in crowd control methods have been widely used on the American public, a surreptitious but nevertheless outrageous assault on human freedom by modifying individual behavior through topical psychology. A German refugee, Kurt Lewin, became director of Tavistock in 1932. He came to the U.S. in 1933 as a "refugee", the first of many infiltrators, and set up the Harvard Psychology Clinic, which originated the propaganda campaign to turn the American public against Germany and involve us in World War II. In 1938, Roosevelt executed a secret agreement with Churchill which in effect ceded U.S. sovereignty to England, because it agreed to let Special Operations Executive control U.S. policies.
To implement this agreement, Roosevelt sent General Donovan to London for indoctrination before setting up OSS (now the CIA) under the aegis of SOE-SIS.The entire OSS program, as well as the CIA has always worked on guidelines set up by the Tavistock Institute.
No wonder OSS has now abandoned his former monicker.
https://transformation.dk/www.raven1.net/mcf/tavistock.htm
OSS not OS
of course it was not self-nominated
Nominated by anon
who was subsequently BOMBED by shills
"Anons chose non comms bakers"
one of the mantras repeated over and over and over again
by SHILLS
class Tavistock techniques
see article
talks about how TAVISTOCK = OSS
*classic
mockery is ineffective with those who have already been repeatedly mocked
fuck off faggot
WHEN YOU HAVE TO TYPE THIS MUCH YOU ARE TRYING TO SPIN.
Here a shills tries to mock someone opposing them by saying they are "trying too hard"
No such thing.
Is POTUS "trying to hard"?
Is General Flynn or Sidney Powell?
Tom Fitton?
Q team?
Right now, "trying hard" is what we do unless we wish to die under a tyrant's watch.
Anon, i have never heard bakers say that - ever.
And I have never done that to any anon, other than by mistake.
Angry anons can sound like shills. To tell the dif, reply reasonably. The shills will get mad, the anons - no.
o7
Then plz ask a specific question. No one can respond to "Que?"
TOWN HALL MEETING in COMMS THURSDAY NIGHT AT 7 pm ET
in Baking Seminar #35 Thread, link to be posted later tonight. OR you can just come here and look for #35 with the image you see posted here. Meeting is not aboutlearning to bake but is taking place in lieu of the normal baking class.
https://8kun.top/comms/catalog.html
Posted late bread because an anon asked why several recent sets of notables were so weird (see cap). It's because the bakers you are used to can no longer bake - or at least, can no longer baker as free anons. Dough is handed to them, which they must accept if they want to bake.
Some of us find this unacceptable. If you do not like what you see - or at least have q's about what's going on - come discuss the state of the board at this LIVE meeting. Anyone who's a non-spammer is welcome.
the choice is yours. i am a long time baker and have been teaching the baking class with another baker - which has resulted in doubling the number of bakers we now have on tap. and attracting an increasing amt of unwelcome attention from shills, unfortunately.
i will not talk here, in the current environment, it's impossible. Anons are welcome to do as they will, this is just an invitation to anyone who wishes to here what the bakers who have baked here for YEARS have to say about baking.
and also for anons to voice their concerns in actual dialog with bakers.
07
NO. Traditional bakers did not split the bred.
OSS seized the bread from a baker and shills joined in to help him keep it. If you don't believe that, that's fine. But it's what actually happened.
In the end, anons will decide what they want. Just thought some might appreciate the chance to talk one on one with bakers who have been baking here for years.