>>10972846
But why don't people know about them and why don't doctors use them?
1) Our Food and Drug laws are terrible.
Those things I mentioned can't be patented. There are no monopoly profits to be gained if it is discovered that baking soda cures cancer. There is no big money in it.
The Food and Drug Act requires that extremely expensive tests are done before the seller of the baking soda can say "this cures cancer" or this is "cancer fighting" or whatever.
Baking Soda is a commodity. Anyone can buy it and put it in a package and sell it (with exceptions, but) it's cheap. Arm and Hammer can't sell this Baking soda for more than the other guy, so, do they want to spend tens or hundreds of millions on tests that prove that a generic commodity that they can't sell at a higher price cures cancer? Not really.
It's not hidden, it's basically forbidden by the FDA and economic laws.
The Food and Drug Act was originally passed around 100 years ago, and things have been bad ever since.
If you had to choose "which works best", would you say,
1) natural
2) invented by man
I'd go with 1). 2) doesn't makes sense.
Perhaps God gave cures, ailments pop up, and God put something there for you to figure out what it does. That's the religious argument.
Things are there because God put them there for a reason.
And the Evolution argument, which goes something like, plants thrived, survived, expanded into new territories, did well, etc., because they benefitted humans. 2 plants, one works to cure something the other doesn't, the human will select the one that works, will breed, cultivate the better one. So, over generations, and occasional mutations, which are selected for, you get some useful plants.
So, you have natural, which is put there for a curative reason by God or evolved through a mutation / cultivation process for curative properties, which seems to have the possibility of curative properties intrinsic. If it cures, it makes sense that it cures, God and/or evolution made it that way.
With man made, why do people think that something that doesn't exist in nature will be something that the body will accept. Oh, it's something that I've never seen before, it's gotta be great? Or, foreign intruder? It doesn't make sense that something man made will be intrinsically good, it seems that man made stuff would be bad, like a foreign intruder.
But if you invent something, you can patent it, and that patent gives you a monopoly, no one else can make it, and you can charge whatever you want. You make monopoly profits, not free market profits like Arm and Hammer, and you can hire pharmaceutical sales reps to bribe doctors to prescribe their meds. You can bribe TV with ads that seem to be more bad than good, but so what, the goal is to give money to TV, so that TV takes your side in issues like vaccines.
That's how it works. It's not about hiding anything, except for like Cancer Society, when discussing the natural cures, makes a big point to mention the lack of tests. They will always do that. We all know that a lack of tests does not mean a lack of effectiveness, because we understand the economic unviability of non patentable natural cures.
The fuckery is built into the core of the system.
Seriously we couldn't have had a generic, go-to antiviral food or drink since March? Look through pubmed, there are tons of things that have some antiviral qualities - a lot I mentioned above.
Either the Fed Gov needs to spend money on doing enough testing to get FDA approval. Does Baking Soda cure cancer? what exactly does it do? Does it cure viruses, what exactly does it do? Fed Gov spend that money, and let manufacturers tell the consumers what are the good things it does.
Or, you allow a new category, like "near drug", you can have a special label "near drug" that indicates that it hasn't been fully FDA tested double blind whatever, but it has been (something??? tested to do a thing on mice and generally recognized as safe. A little mouse logo. The mouse logo could be explained somewhere. This Baking Soda helped with cancer in mice. Mouse Logo, and then a list of the things that it has been tested good for. Maybe there's a website with links to the studies on pubmed.
It's not set up currently to help the people, to cure them cheaply easily safely, its set up to benefit the medical industry and especially the pharmaceutical cartel.