>>10977437 (LB)
Here is my half baked analysis. I was trying to prove that it was a Trident II being launch from a sub. I ended up disproving that. So it was more likely a missile flying horizontally south-bound from somewhere out of view. Unknown if this was a offensive missile targeting AF1 or if it was a second defensive missile shooting down the first (unseen).
>>10977491 (LB)
I don't think there ever was a video. This is from a weather camera that takes stills and time-lapses.
Those are the stills* (20 sec apart) strung together in a video. Pic related.
However, this is useful in debunking the helicopter explanation. A helicopter would have taken much longer than 20 seconds to cover that distance and therefore should have been visible in multiple frames.
https://anonfile.com
>Mostly, because it appears to be a missile launched from Naval Air Station Whidbey Island.
Not even the right camera for that. The Naval station was in the direction monitored by Cam 1. Now-famous missile pic was captured by Cam 2.
"View of weather cam" doesn't look right.
Nah. these events are not connected. Ketron Island and the weather cam are 50 miles apart. And the missile was launched from somewhere further north of the Cam.
It's not surprising that retired submarine captains would live the the Puget Sound area. There is a major naval port in the area that services nuke subs and aircraft carriers, one of only a few on the west coast.