Anonymous ID: 18f654 Oct. 7, 2020, 11:58 p.m. No.10978939   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8955 >>8969 >>8983 >>8996

>>10978610

NOTABLE

Deeply fucking interesting, an excerpt:

 

You see, what’s going on, Patrick, is that at this point President Obama has his people across the federal bureaucracy, but especially the Department of Justice. Hillary is going to be president for eight years and nothing is going to stop that, but while she’s president the evidence you were part of gathering is going to be sitting on a “Bunsen burner” within the Department of Justice, and the hand on that Bunsen burner is going to be the hand of one of Barack Obama’s people. If Hillary is a good girl, defends Obamacare etc., that hand will keep the Bunsen burner on “Low”. If she is a bad girl, starts thinking for herself, that hand [mimes twisting a dial] will turn the Bunsen burner to “High”. That way, for the eight years she is President, Hillary is going to be managed by Barack Obama. Then Hillary is going to step down, and Michelle is going to run… And Patrick, that’s the plan.

 

It gets even better:

That is to say, Russiagate is not about Trump It was setup on the Republican Party that was crafted in 2015. Trump came along, won the nomination and then the White House, but along the way crashed into a pre-canned scandal that was in the works before he was President, before he was nominee, and quite likely, before he even declared.

 

This is the guy who was CEO of Overstock, all about his involvement with Maria Butina, and how the govt. was using him to get to her in a Red-Sparrow-esque play to drum up Russiagate. Holy shit. This should be mandatory reading.

Anonymous ID: 18f654 Oct. 8, 2020, 12:07 a.m. No.10978976   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8994

>>10978955

Yeah but it won't make notables. Maybe spruce up the drop with a pic or a vid link. This kind of research is the real deal, and what all the arguing shilly motherfuckers SHOULD be looking at.

 

After 3x I usually just give up.

Anonymous ID: 18f654 Oct. 8, 2020, 12:20 a.m. No.10979036   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10978994

Saw that, must have posted at the same time. Amazing! Although I wouldn't call it a theory, more like a first hand account.

 

But whatev., hopefully this will get some light on it. Never heard of this deep capture thing. Good stuff.

Anonymous ID: 18f654 Oct. 8, 2020, 12:23 a.m. No.10979045   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9069 >>9090

>>10979032

This discussion assumes we know the launch location, but I'm not sure we officially do. Did Q ever confirm it, or was Whitby Island just an assumption on our part? The sub that launched it could have been over the horizon from where the photo was taken.

Anonymous ID: 18f654 Oct. 8, 2020, 12:55 a.m. No.10979160   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9168 >>9174 >>9199

>>10979069

When that whole thing was unfolding, the 'official' explanation was that 'it' was moving toward the camera, throwing off the speed and apparent trajectory perception, i believe the news was saying it was a jet flying toward the camera.

 

However, a lot of astute anons that day analyzing the proportions, color, and shape of the missile concluded that it was indeed a D5 Trident. I don't remember if tridents are only fired from subs.

 

None of it made sense to me in the context of shooting it at POTUS, until someone theorize that an ICBM would only need to get near to AF-1 on the other side of the ocean to take it out. Sounds feasible, though I don't know what kind of ability black hats would have of updating the target location on the fly, or changing the detonation altitude. Presumably you would not know 'exactly' where AF-1 would be 30 minutes from now, although you could program an intercept course if you knew the flight plan, then adjust as necessary during warhead re-entry? Seems like a pretty thin plan, if that was their plan.

Anonymous ID: 18f654 Oct. 8, 2020, 12:58 a.m. No.10979172   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10979152

What I'm saying is that if they ARE machiavellian schemers, then using protocols as evidence is foolish as it does not even withstand 5 minutes of scrutiny.

Anonymous ID: 18f654 Oct. 8, 2020, 1:17 a.m. No.10979232   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9240

>>10979218

Only the [DS] could show a picture of a missile and then say 'see its not a missile, thats just a conspiracy theory'.

 

KEK.

 

The stupid burns, but they have been getting away with it for so long.

Anonymous ID: 18f654 Oct. 8, 2020, 1:22 a.m. No.10979246   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9268

>>10979230

>There is nothing masterful

 

Until you see the plan at its fruition and recognize the mastery. It looks to me like he is fundamentally capturing the judiciary and bankers, to ultimately free the country from the deep state clutches. You would rather see Hillary arrested first, and all the other fucks play nice until Trump is out of office? The rabbit hole is way deeper than her…they ALL need to be wrangled.

Anonymous ID: 18f654 Oct. 8, 2020, 1:24 a.m. No.10979253   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10979224

>>10979224

But but but, the rising sun reflecting off the bottom of a passenger jet, on a long shutter time lapse, would create this effect , blah blah

 

They were actually saying that back when it happened. Desperate for people not to see a missile.

Anonymous ID: 18f654 Oct. 8, 2020, 1:31 a.m. No.10979288   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10979243

Easiest way for them to 'manufacture' the virus, is to create something so mildly harmless that no one could differentiate it from a cold or flu. Wait until most of the population has been exposed before 'revealing it' and start testing for it. "Wow look at all the people with this thing, whoah lookit all these people dying, i.e. time to panic."

 

So they essentially 'identified' something that would have been common and gave it a name. Guarantee overall death statistics for 2020 will not even show a blip outside of standard deviation. But hey, we can test for it, we can see that it has its own distinct properties. Now all they need to do is keep monkeying with the tests and statistics for as long as they think it helps them achieve their goals.