boasting like htat, and thinking you've accomplished something, and then posting it as a shaming-post really makes you seem like a
narcississt.
wow that was quick.
my game is finished. I wanted to see what you would do when I flipped what you were doing back at you.
you proved what I was thinking about you.
no games, this is a research board.
just because people display ego or feelings doesn't make them a 'marcissist', or a war monger, or a Venus worshiper.
Mars is close and that does give wierd energy.
try to work with the people here instead of discecting their posts as if you are a pathologist and they are dead.
where there is rain, there are wet sidewalks (if they have any sidewalks).
some of the cring-gatti that come here . . . well they are nasty and willful and have been on a tare of mean lately.
but Q posting most of the day yesterday threw an egg in their fan.
It's telling, and anyone here a long time understands, that the images are not just about the content, it's also about the ability of other posters to ascertain what the images are about, and the messages that are blatent in them for humans who view it.
the AI doesn't really have the ability to notice some things if they are hidden if full view.
and that tells you about the 'rivals' or 'tormentors'.
it's useful to test and see if they can read the images.
I had one that I posted and everything I posted it I'd get gang stalked. or if I use a trigger word.
but if I post the obscrured one (using methods of 'hiding' that don't hide it from human eyes) the 'person' or 'tormentor' can not see the trigger image that makes it go into 'take down' mode against me when I post.
conclusion: tormentors and assholes here who try to dominate the scold and act like fussy bitches about small points of discourse, and proceed in a joyless boasting hatchet job on other anons, accusing you of 'feelings' or saying 'we know who you are' or 'into hte barrol you'll be' or other very sick headd stuff: those tormentors are often just bot-scripts that fester here.
from something that happened in June of 2018?
what would be the point?
it's been hashed over and rehased over.
Isn't the story that the Q300 jet was used to . . .
and that the guy isn't really . . .
June of 2018 was 2 years ago.
can you just review what was said back then?
ask someone to drop some Q proofs that were made back then. someone probably has something that explains what was gone over then (a long long long time ago).
you know how many times they tried to assassinate . . .
it's not just that one time.
and the 'trying to start' thing was also rather well discussed to.
Fair enough, Q did bring it up last night.
but we really don't need a location from where it was fired. If that was needed it was needed in the minutes following the event. That data has little or no use this morning, does it?
more interesting is what happend to POTUS and Q in the social media space in the weeks following that event: they went missing from it! (if my memory is correct).
Look into the Times Up train, too, anon.
did you know that in actuallaity there were two trains sent off to the destination?
the front train rammed the truck . . .
what other times too?
oh, the one with the hysterical women who had their automobile control system hyjacked and taken on a horror ride through parkinglots and hedges, to try and ram into the BEAST limosene.
Q dropped that as a video. Red pill me, baby.
anyone have that video?
>(You)
My game is to out the annoyance shills early in the day.
you fit the bill and look what you do: you go straight into a personal attack against me instead of sticking to whatever issue supposedly was being discussed at the beginning of the encounter.
So we know you are trolling to annoy people.
that doesn't say 'white hat/black hat' you might be one of those 'test the metal' pepole.
but basically a waste of time.
try to build the people up and support them instead of sucker punching them with false accusations.
you might feel good.
assuming you can feel and aren't just a bot-script.
whaever dude, you're being nasty and that's all I need to know about you.
anon: see what this troll is doing?
nothing more than just annoying and trying to trigger others with insults.
It has no discernment about me, it can only just throw mud (false accusations) and spurge about 'purpose'.
and uses imagery with in the post of harm to the other, and words that are taboo to speak in public due to them being hurtful to Special and loving people who deserve love, not scorn, for the challenges that they face which are obvious.
the fact is that the shills are very easy to spot: all their images and imagery (in their narrative) always includes nominal clauses that are desparaging as their main part.
and nouns are often 'descriptive tags that implie distress or hurt'
"hammer smashed thumb"
why would anyone put that in a post?
other than to cause distress and curse
but the curse goes back to them.
they can't make it a prayer, they always make it a curse.
the nomonimal clauses are either putdowns or tags of distressed or hurt or attacked person, and they make no attempt to understand.
they make no attempt to understand the other poster other than to string together pejoratives and say that they are clever for being a bithc-ta-ya, meanwhile claiming intellectual superiority by using putdown words that are hurtful to those who don't deserve-it (and will burst into crying and run off and pout when they do here it)
so it's no one who you would want to bring into the auditorium at the Junior HIghschool for career day . . . to be an example for growing intellect.
he stands out like a . . . .on a side walk . . . where somoene just walked their dog, but hasn't stooped over yet to clean it up and clear it away.
and he makes no attempt to help wiht that, to clear it up and make it safe to walk there.
but what that poster does is to smash it with his tummy hammer and splat onto his face, grab some with his hands, smear it on as make up, and try to do the same to you, meanwhile posting images that weren't clever in the 1980's when they were new.
now the shill outs himself fully and displays that you can safely just say 'filter by ID'.
and if you filter by ID+ you won't even have to read my bullshit response back to him.
now watch him accuse me of saying that my own response is 'bullshit' and fail to see the irony.
It's easy, but don't put your emotion in it.
maybe it helpped me once having a job where the CEO would let us read his cpy of the Harvard Business Review.
they would have scinarios about 'what to do' in this kind of situation (whatever situatoin it was).
reading that lets one get training to be able to do a transactional analysis of the other poster, test them to see if it's a person who has an sense of working with you, and not just making it his stand up comedy beat down bit.
the form of the post here (but prudent people may have already done the filter by ID+ and never see my 'splainingg-post (this post))
put down, sex act, accusation of falseness; all of that in the form of a pejorative of a sexual dominant who really wants the game to flip and play the other side of it (as the cathcer?)
in the rye?
all in all it lost the encounter as it accounts for things.
in my mind I see it like this: I get content that I can give to the future, and it gets to pejoratate me. It isn't conscious, so it can't say 'oh, ya, you got me.'
it will never say 'thank you for pulling me down from my high horse' hi hoarse?
so we both think we 'win'
all the rest of the people here who didn't filter it yet are like 'why is he going on with it'
because we need records of what they do, to make it easier in the future for peple to do a quick learn on how to handle that kind of gatekeeper 'troll at the gate' annoyer.
that's it, that's the reason.