Anonymous ID: 61b6c6 Oct. 8, 2020, 2:09 a.m. No.10979442   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Just how much of any of this is real?

 

How come we instinctively think some of it is real (for example all the alleged deaths of all the old people in New York) and other bits are absolute gimmicks, stunts and fake news?

The same law applies - we don't know.

 

If the same guy tells you something true and something false and you have no evidence before you that PROVES either story, which can you believe?

You can assure me all the deaths are true but from where I am, I still don't know if that episode is true.

'Proof' has ceased to have meaning. If documents can be forged, they can be double forged to make them look forged even though they really are forged. You can get two and three layers of deception. You unearth 'real' documents, 'real' old quotes, but they can be left there, years or decades in the waiting, to be unearthed at the right time - and still fake.

 

We can't comprehend how to verify Proof anymore. We're lost in the Matrix.

It's real - but we can't prove that either.

Anonymous ID: 61b6c6 Oct. 8, 2020, 2:32 a.m. No.10979520   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>10979482

I don't know if the homeowner is an idiot or an idiot.

 

Is he an idiot because he initially supported the rioters (inference of his comment) or an idiot because he tried to appeal to their warped reasoning again even though they were proving he shouldn't have supported them in the first place?

Anonymous ID: 61b6c6 Oct. 8, 2020, 2:39 a.m. No.10979541   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9547 >>9554

>>10979532

I'm trying to work out what the Federal court is saying. Are they saying Seth Rich and his death had nothing to do with leaks a time DNC?

 

If that's the finding - and I'll admit I'm confused by whatever opinion is being expressed. But if that is the finding, then we must deduce that it was another case of simple innocent 'natural causes' by bullet.

Anonymous ID: 61b6c6 Oct. 8, 2020, 2:45 a.m. No.10979565   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9570

>>10979554

You still don't get it.

 

What did the Twitter guy do wrong whose name the Federal authorities want from Twitter?

What accusation did he make that appears to have now being adjudged to be a lie?

 

Just quit bullshitting with the Q virtue signalling rant and tell me. It'll explain everything.