>>10982058
>- Tell the accusers to bring their issues to the board meta
Nobody would get a word in edgewise due to the shilling that would be going on. We both know it.
-
That's what an arbitrator and captain of a ship does. A lot of insults are flying around along with accusations. The accusations get lost in the fight and then new accusations are presented. Each one needs to be clarified and evidence presented on both sides. Clearly, without insults. Easy. It's arbitration. Someone in the middle laying down the ground rules.
>- Hear them and look at evidence
See answer above.
>- Act as an impartial arbitrator
Cant happen, its his board. Of course he would be partial. Whats more, whatever he decided on shills & anons wouldnt accept because of the belief of back channels.
-
As captain of the ship he has to be impartial. Evidence is evidence, truth is truth and only the truth matters
-
Fastjack has a backchannel? Is that the same discord he's always had?
>- Reinstate baker checks for a while as 8bit did
There goes the transparency anons claim they want.
>- If any baker is found not working for the truth, they don't bake
Truth to whom? As decided by whom?
>- State that any accusations should be made off general, with hard evidence provided
When evidence is presented off bread, anons aren't heard already. When proof is given, anons aren't heard already