dChan
Anonymous ID: d069f8 Oct. 8, 2020, 8:26 a.m. No.10981955   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1968 >>1971 >>2045 >>2079 >>2102 >>2180 >>2215

>>10981779

>>10981838

I'd also like to know where Fastjack is, why he hasn't stepped in to help and, put out a call for him to intervene.

 

The main thing is that Q has a thread to post. There are bakers baking even if it's just the 2 that took over.

The negative things are -

  • Research is disrupted

  • Notables aren't being aggregated

  • Notables are full of personal accusations

  • Anons are tired of it all

 

Almost as if it was planned, isn't it. It happened on the weekend exactly 30 days before the election. Weird.

 

At this point everyone's tried and it needs an arbitrator to look at the claims and be in the midde. I hope FJ has his captain's hat on and steps up to the plate.

Anonymous ID: d069f8 Oct. 8, 2020, 8:32 a.m. No.10982008   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2058

>>10981971

Here's what Fastjack could do -

  • Tell the accusers to bring their issues to the board meta

  • Hear them and look at evidence

  • Act as an impartial arbitrator

  • Reinstate baker checks for a while as 8bit did

  • If any baker is found not working for the truth, they don't bake

  • State that any accusations should be made off general, with hard evidence provided

 

Fixed in 5

Anonymous ID: d069f8 Oct. 8, 2020, 8:51 a.m. No.10982206   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2227 >>2242

 

>>10982058

>- Tell the accusers to bring their issues to the board meta

Nobody would get a word in edgewise due to the shilling that would be going on. We both know it.

  • That's what an arbitrator and captain of a ship does. A lot of insults are flying around along with accusations. The accusations get lost in the fight and then new accusations are presented. Each one needs to be clarified and evidence presented on both sides. Clearly, without insults. Easy. It's arbitration. Someone in the middle laying down the ground rules.

 

>- Hear them and look at evidence

See answer above.

  • See answer above

 

>- Act as an impartial arbitrator

Cant happen, its his board. Of course he would be partial. Whats more, whatever he decided on shills & anons wouldnt accept because of the belief of back channels.

  • As captain of the ship he has to be impartial. Evidence is evidence, truth is truth and only the truth matters

  • Fastjack has a backchannel? Is that the same discord he's always had?

 

>- Reinstate baker checks for a while as 8bit did

There goes the transparency anons claim they want.

  • There would be transparency. Anyone not working for the truth to present the truth as anons research provides would not get the keys to the kitchen. Likewise not able to taint anons notes collation with personal accusations therefore stopping aggregators from collecting and getting anon's work out there.

 

>- If any baker is found not working for the truth, they don't bake

Truth to whom? As decided by whom?

  • Material provided by anons through their digs, research and posts, as has traditionally been done.

 

>- State that any accusations should be made off general, with hard evidence provided

When evidence is presented off bread, anons aren't heard already. When proof is given, anons aren't heard already

  • That's when an arbitrator is required

Anonymous ID: d069f8 Oct. 8, 2020, 8:59 a.m. No.10982289   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10982215

Doesn't seem like that from where I'm sitting.

It looks like many 1 post anons attempting to create a consensus that there was an issue.

 

Looking at the threads anons don't seem too happy at the moment. And still the aggregators aren't collecting.