New 2nd report from Chinese researchers claiming coronavirus is a laboratory product
Note that Q has never used the term "bioweapon" or "engineer" [wrt a virus] as least as far as I can determine from searching several of the Q databases like https://operationq.pub/ , https://qanon.pub/ , https://qagg.news/ , https://qposts.online/ , and others. This is probably because of severe international treaty repercussions on biowarfare.
https://thenationalpulse.com/coronavirus/unrestricted-bioweapon-china-whistleblower-dr-yan-releases-new-report-claiming-coronavirus-is-laboratory-product/
Archived (with full 33-page embedded paper) at:
https://archive.md/rtbRw
'Unrestricted Bioweeapon': China Whistleblower Dr. Yan Releases New Report Claiming Coronavirus is 'Laboratory Product'
The National Pulse edited by Raheem Kassam
October 8, 2020
Staff Writer
THE LONG-AWAITED SECOND REPORT FROM DR. LI-MENG YAN – THE CHINESE WHISTLEBLOWER WHO CAME TO THE UNITED STATES TO EXPOSE THE CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY’S VIRUS – HAS BEEN RELEASED. AND IT’S EXPLOSIVE.
The report, embedded below, explains:
Two possibilities should be considered for the origin of SARS-CoV-2: natural evolution or laboratory creation. In our earlier report titled “Unusual Features of the SARS-CoV-2 Genome Suggesting Sophisticated Laboratory Modification Rather Than Natural Evolution and Delineation of Its Probable Synthetic Route”, we disproved the possibility of SARS-CoV-2 arising naturally through evolution and instead proved that SARS-CoV-2 must have been a product of laboratory modification. Despite this and similar efforts, the laboratory creation theory continues to be downplayed or even diminished. This is fundamentally because the natural origin theory remains supported by several novel coronaviruses published after the start of the outbreak.
The conclusion is perhaps the most explosive we’ve seen on the pandemic in a while, wherein Dr. Yan, Shu Kang (PhD), Jie Guan (PhD), and Shanchang Hu explain:
If SARS-CoV-2 is of a natural origin, no fabrications would be needed to suggest so. The current report, therefore, corroborates our earlier report and further proves that SARS-CoV-2 is a laboratory product.
And further adds:
Although it is not easy for the public to accept SARS-CoV-2 as a bioweapon due to its relatively low lethality, this virus indeed meets the criteria of a bioweapon as described by Dr. Ruifu Yang. Aside from his appointment in the AMMS, Dr. Yang is also a key member of China’s National and Military Bioterrorism Response Consultant Group and had participated in the investigation of the Iraqi bioweapon program as a member of the United Nations Special Commission (UNSCOM) in 1998. In 2005, Dr. Yang specified the 'criteria for a pathogen to qualify as a bioweapon:
1. It is significantly virulent and can cause large scale casualty.
2. It is highly contagious and transmits easily, often through respiratory routes in the form of aerosols. The most dangerous scenario would be that it allows human-to-human transmission.
3. It is relatively resistant to environmental changes, can sustain transportation, and is capable of supporting targeted release.
Clearly, SARS-CoV-2 not only meets but also surpasses the standards of a traditional bioweapon. Therefore, it should be defined as an Unrestricted Bioweapon.
Finally, in addition to the thirty pages of scientific detail on the report, Dr. Yan et al insist:
The scientific evidence and records indicate that the current pandemic is not a result of accidental release of a gain-of-function product but a planned attack using an Unrestricted Bioweapon. The current pandemic therefore should be correspondingly considered as a result of Unrestricted Biowarfare.
Under such circumstances, the infected population are being used, unconsciously, as the vectors of the disease to facilitate the spread of the infection. The first victims of the attack were the Chinese people, especially those in the city of Wuhan. At the initial stage, the hidden spread in Wuhan could have also served another purpose: the final verification of the bioweapon’s functionality, an important aspect of which is the human-to-human transmission efficiency. Upon the success of this last step, targeted release of the pathogen might have been enabled.
You can find the "The 2nd Yan Report" on Scribd at (free to view but must pay to download pdf):
https://www.scribd.com/document/479224616/The-2nd-Yan-Report#from_embed
All 33 pages of the pdf are archived at:
https://archive.md/kyAgj
Also see similar story plus embedded pdf at:
https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/covid-19-unrestricted-bioweapon-whistleblower-releases-second-paper-alleging-large-scale