>>10982644 lb

Here's the catch with crytpo:

Most of the time, people using it ARE NOT criminals. Framing this situation in a way where it seems like that's the bulk of use for crypto harms the potential for its wider adoption.

It seems like we're still in the range where feds want to take down little guys who don't like being stolen from ("taxes") or who want to innovate various aspects of technological interaction.

For instance, Blockchain can help with a myriad of different areas from Insurance, Government, Education, General Finance, Information Assurance and so, so much more.

We cannot stifle these areas of growth and they must be promoted.

The issue with all of this is that it appears that in their pursuit of criminals, average joes like myself are likely to be targeted. People like Peter Schiff make outstanding points when they say that taxation is theft. Considering how bloated our government is and the grotesque things that it does after forcing us to pay for it, I don't see why so much of my money is stolen from me in order to facilitate these disasters and therefore look for ways to ensure that I can keep the money that I generate by myself and for myself.

Taxation is the very reason we fought the Revolution and it's the same reason we fought the Civil War.

The sooner that /ourguys/ realize this and offer us some aid, the sooner this mess is resolved.

Our country generated federal funds in plenty of ways prior to seizing assets from citizens by force at increments that revolve around their wages. Therefore, an integral aspect of the pursuit of The Plan requires that we dismantle this system wherein all citizens are stolen from and forced to earn a wage under someone else's approval. The point I'm making is that crypto can offer us this very reward, should we let it prosper.

I fully understand what I'm saying here and I also fully understand who ought to be receiving this message.

We cannot allow this to continue. We must make necessary changes and ignore the pleas for funds so that we can maintain national security, so that we can save citizens of other, failing nations, so that we can fight wars on someone else's behalf, so that we can do egregious experiments on unsuspecting victims, so that we can pursue knowledge that evades public perception and so, so much more.

Decentralized Finance is the key to concluding this charade and should we ignore the concern trolling (which I will generously admit exists and never meant to avoid doing) being conducted by feds, we just may find a way to do away with the banksters who are holding this great nation by the balls.

What is Constitutional Money?

What is Decentralized Finance?

How might these things mesh?

Why is it important to upend the current financial paradigm?

Why is this issue always so often entirely contorted when presented to normies?

>>10983334

Yep.

"New Age" has an anchored definition that forces the normies/newfags to think of hippies or generally annoying post-Christian zoomers.

You just haven't had the more occult aspects of what /ourguys/ think/know adequately explained to you yet.

There's much, much more to what's going on that you're currently allowed to observe. I believe this is one of the things Q insists we take "baby steps" with.

The trick, ultimately, is deciphering how /ourguys/ and [they] feel about given topics. That's when it gets pretty tough.

>>10983455

This is a great counter point!

The only issue is that you're going to be unwilling or unable to send ounces of Gold or Silver across the country, across oceans, or likely even across the state, in order to facilitate business deals, correct?

Most make the mistake of insisting that a looming digital currency is going to destroy privacy, offer [them] the ability to bar us from interacting with the financial system, and plenty of other concerntrolling bullshit. In reality, Credit already does these things and has been the digital version of FRNs for decades now.

In other words, we already have a digital currency.

What I'm suggesting is that we make the digital version of our currency Decentralized, so that [they] cannot manipulate the ledger that dictates the value of our currency.

I'll admit, I don't know enough about the technology side of things or how these two tools would interact, but I think if we had a pool of metals that matched something called a "stablecoin" (which is supposed to rest at $1 or another set amount) for digital use, we could solve the issues that removing Credit (which is just Debt) would present.

I'm sorry this is so verbose. I don't mean to be. It's just that this topic is extremely dear to me and I've done a lot of thinking about it.

Most normies still have little comprehension of Blockchain.

Keep in mind, I never mentioned Bitcoin. I'm asking no one to buy Bitcoin. I don't even necessarily think it's a good idea.

I'm only advocating for a wider adoption of Blockchain as a whole and think we need to do more to understand how it could mesh with a new financial system that actually exists to serve We, The People instead of this bullshit Monopoly system we're all using.

>>10983475

>Water is alive and emotions and bad thoughts have real power of fuckery.

Water is the essence of life.

Water is actually symbolic of Life and its creation.

Of course it's alive and of course it's a medium for information travel/vibrational discourse.

>>10983617

The Founding Fathers created the New World Order.

This is a psyop that too many of you have fallen for.

The Founding Fathers explicitly mentioned that they're creating a new order to disrupt the Monarchical system. Franklin himself even mentioned that it's ours to keep so long as we're able to keep it.

The New World Order is a paradigm that rests upon National Sovereignty, which does away with empires. You'll notice that since the creation of this great nation, plenty of countries around the world have maybe kept their monarchs, but have vastly limited their influence upon the political system (on the surface, at least).

>>10983703

I think you read something separate from what I've written. I don't really know how to respond to this… I didn't create any government.

kek

>>10983733

The lines are, unfortunately, not quite so clear. There are arguments to be made for both sides, like the Global agenda spurring wide innovation (which is the essence for the unifying the species vs an outside threat theory). At the same time, our way is more likely to see individuals retain freedom and see significantly less stress, which helps them more easily pursue happiness.

Either way, I know which one I'd prefer.

>>10983776

It was only ever just a surface-level theory.

I'm not sure what came of it.

>>10983818

First, use lb/pb.

Secondly, do not fucking shill bags here.

We use this place to inform people, not get them to hold bags.

Go be a faggot somewhere else.

Besides, it won't be Ripple. It'll be a clean currency that big $ hasn't already used to hedge vs other assets.

At least don't drool on the normies if you're going to shill to them…

>>10983835

They do these things all of the time. It's a reintroduction to sever the old psychological anchor to the term.

Think "Feminism" for instance. It used to be about promoting the genius of women, who were never really afforded an opportunity to contribute much before birth control came about. Of course, it had extensive ramifications… but that's another story.

Nowadays, "Feminism" means sexualizing young women and convincing them that having a family is boring or pointless.

>>10983837

Thanks for helping explain the above…

kek

Also, I agree.

>>10983867

It's going to be clean.

Like… OrionCoin

kek

Do it, faggots.

>>10983925

As within

So without

>>10983974

Are you kidding?

This is beyond thrilling!

I guess it depends on who you think is revolting against who though…

>>10984006

That's what you think.