Anonymous ID: 8cbe1c Oct. 8, 2020, 2:13 p.m. No.10985804   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5809 >>5925 >>5998 >>6072 >>6441

looked again into Qs missle post. there is plausable explanation for it if its a time lapse photo. but i found a few probs with the explanation.

  1. skunkbayweather is not posting time lapse photos anymore. you wouldnt be able to see ripples in the water with said 20sec time lapse.

  2. even at 160mph the helicopter would only have moved 0.8 miles in 20sec…seems like the path would have been much shorter in the photo.

that being said the helicopter theory could still be reasonable explanation since youd think there would be more eye witnesses to a missile launch.

Anonymous ID: 8cbe1c Oct. 8, 2020, 2:35 p.m. No.10986056   🗄️.is 🔗kun

https://wmerthon6.wixsite.com/website-1/post/comprehensive-analysis-of-the-whidbey-island-missile

 

so i debunk this guys theory using distance traveled by heli in 20sec, water waves not visible in time lapse of 20sec and what do we get?

 

A BUNCH OF FCKN RETARDS DONT UNDERSTAND IT

 

YOU FCKED UP NOW RUN AWAY OR USE FACTS

Anonymous ID: 8cbe1c Oct. 8, 2020, 2:52 p.m. No.10986251   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10985958

EXCUSE ME YOU FCK RETARDS

 

THATS NOT A VIDEO ITS A SERIES OF TIME LAPSE PHOTOS.

 

IF YOU WANT TO DEBUNK THEIR EXPLANATION YOU NEED TO DEBUNK THE 20SEC TIME LAPSE WITH DISTANCE TRAVELED BY HELI MAX 160MPH

 

GO LOOK AT MY FCKN ORIGINAP POST AND THEN GO FCK YOUSELVES FOR BEING STUPID