>>10986479 past bread notable

Just to be clear. This post is bullshit. PF checked that tail number all the way back to the end of May and in all that time it never had the call sign ANON. Not that we have not seen the call sign used before. But this posting complete bullshit. Needs to be pointed out because this aircraft is sometimes used as Air Force Two. It was in August.

The one aircraft that PF HAS seen with ANON as the call sign was one that it used by Special Operations. NOT the Executive Branch in DC.