>>10988277 pb

I'm going to explain what Q was doing with this post. Perhaps everyone understood what Q was doing, and 100 people decided to type some comment that reflects no understanding whatsoever of what Q was trying to say. I'm going to explain what Q was doing as if I was Q.

"Hi, I'm Q, I'm going to explain what this post means. What I did with this post was explain to you how this code works. The core message is that I was telling you with the post on October 7 that something was going to happen with the 25th Amendment real soon. And it did. The very next day, Nancy Pelosi talked about the 25th Amendment. "

"On October 7, you saw a picture of a rocket, and I mentioned a helicopter, and said "remember". And maybe some of you saw that post with the rocket, helicoper and remember, and you said to yourself "I remember that, or I just looked it up, Q also talked about the 25th Amendment that day. Perhaps when Q puts up a message with that picture of a rocket and mentions a helicopter, it's a signal to us that something 25th Amendment is coming." That's right, that's what I did. That is how my code process works. Perhaps it doesn't work that way all the time, but it did this time."

"The reason I made this post wasn't just to toot my own horn about how I got one right, but it was to teach you one method of decoding my posts, understanding my predictions. What you do to "get" what I'm saying - when you see something like this that you don't understand - is to see if I have shown that picture before, in one of my earlier posts. If I, for example, made a post 2 years ago (I didn't) with a big lump of shit, a comment about how bad a certain sports team is, and then Gonna Get Rothschild and Soros soon, and then I follow up today with the same picture of a big pile of shit, a similar comment about the same sports team, and nothing about Rothschild and Soros, what you might be able to figure out is that something Rothschild and Soros is coming."

"In a more abstract sense, what I'm doing, my code, here, is fill the pattern, complete the group. I give A, B and C, and then I do a very similar thing, and only give you A and B, that means that you look out for C happening."

>>10992036

Here is what Q seems to be saying with this and the one he was replying to.

The CIA can't spy the way that the FBI and the DOJ can.

The CIA - Brennan - did spy. And "the top" is probably Hillary.

CIA / Brennan / Hillary / Obama (maybe) - Illegal Spying.

>>10988277 pb

I'm going to explain what Q was doing with this post. Perhaps everyone understood what Q was doing, and 100 people decided to type some comment that reflects no understanding whatsoever of what Q was trying to say. I'm going to explain what Q was doing as if I was Q.

"Hi, I'm Q, I'm going to explain what this post means. What I did with this post was explain to you how this code works. The core message is that I was telling you with the post on October 7 that something was going to happen with the 25th Amendment real soon. And it did. The very next day, Nancy Pelosi talked about the 25th Amendment. "

"On October 7, you saw a picture of a rocket, and I mentioned a helicopter, and said "remember". And maybe some of you saw that post with the rocket, helicoper and remember, and you said to yourself "I remember that, or I just looked it up, Q also talked about the 25th Amendment that day. Perhaps when Q puts up a message with that picture of a rocket and mentions a helicopter, it's a signal to us that something 25th Amendment is coming." That's right, that's what I did. That is how my code process works. Perhaps it doesn't work that way all the time, but it did this time."

"The reason I made this post wasn't just to toot my own horn about how I got one right, but it was to teach you one method of decoding my posts, understanding my predictions. What you do to "get" what I'm saying - when you see something like this that you don't understand - is to see if I have shown that picture before, in one of my earlier posts. If I, for example, made a post 2 years ago (I didn't) with a big lump of shit, a comment about how bad a certain sports team is, and then Gonna Get Rothschild and Soros soon, and then I follow up today with the same picture of a big pile of shit, a similar comment about the same sports team, and nothing about Rothschild and Soros, what you might be able to figure out is that something Rothschild and Soros is coming."

"In a more abstract sense, what I'm doing, my code, here, is fill the pattern, complete the group. I give A, B and C, and then I do a very similar thing, and only give you A and B, that means that you look out for C happening."

>>10993475

agreed. I like the Christian Unity message.

Do blacks really like being led around by Jews?

Maybe they're taking that deal because they think it was the best deal they could get.

I would like to have black men on our side and not have to try at all to get a single Jew vote.

Christians v Jews is simple, and we should be able to get a decent number of black and hispanic Christians to join our team.

>>10993820

I thought the same thing when I saw the wiping picture. I believe that the wiping picture was posted here.

>>10993793

HCQ does work. I think it should be out there more. It doesn't seem to be something that will kill covid dead immediately. But we're acting in a context of NOTHING. Which is better, HCQ or NOTHING or a mask?

HCQ will knock down your infectivity, I believe they call it viral shedding, it prevents, treats, cures, but not 100% immediately. It's been FDA approved for 65 years and it costs nothing to make.

At the same time that HCQ has been pushed aside, hidden by the media, attacked by the media and Democrats, half the people who are dying of covid or more than half, were nursing home residents. And the way the covid gets into the nursing home, for the most part, not counting the Dem Govs who were intentionally putting covids in with nursing home residents, is through the nursing home workers. You make sure those nursing home workers eat a hydroxychloroquine pill every so often in the effort to make sure the nursing home workers don't get covid and kill a bunch of nursing home residents. You could spend on daily tests, you could give the nursing home workers the HCQ, you can do both. You can do more.

Laura Ingraham had on 3 experts, Stanford, Harvard, Oxford, and they have a new plan. Protect the vulnerable (sounds like nursing homes to me) and let everything else get back to normal. Let the healthy people get it, develop herd immunity, and then reintroduce the at risk vulnerables, in a context where a lot of people have immunity. The vulnerables - which are the ones we should be caring about - the healthy don't get very sick from this - are safer when the healthys already got it and can't get it again, there just aren't as many people it can infect and then it goes away.

>>10994057

>>10994051

1) It's popular. There is always a lot of activity.

2) It's not facebook, land of censorship.

3) It's a free speech board, a place where you can wail on the bad guys where you'd be censored elsewhere

4) we want what Q is saying to be true

5) this is where the action is. the Democrats in government just went out of their way to officially complain about Q.

there are plenty of reasons to be here if you aren't quite happy about scoreboard and aren't really sold on the legitimacy of Q as top level insider.

>>10994126

I think you're talking about Jews.

>>10994153

Pedo was pushed by Hollywood Jews, movies like Pretty Baby, Brooke Shields.

Not "boomers"