Wrong, I'm not a baker. Do you dispute what I posted in answer to fellow anon?
I'm nothing you say, I'm anon. GTFO you devisive shill, constantly attacking anons.
Instead of attacking me, attack what I posted in answer to anon - oh, that's right, you can't. My response was an accurate answer to anon's question - would you silence me?
Attacking anons is divisive.
I'm here for Q, here for research, memes and like minded anons - 'you know, the thing' (what most anons are here for).
>Once again, just attacks. Its all the kitchen and its monks have.
See, now you've outed yourself:
I actually entertained the idea that OSS might be right - you know, examining the angles. But as the week has gone on, the notables deteriorate into shite, the constant shilling by OSS & cronies, news aggregators not being able to get anons' info out to the normies - ANY entertaining of OSS being correct are firmly gone. It was infiltration, what OSS/CIA/spooks do best.
eyes on, discerning anons