Anonymous ID: 8501f6 April 19, 2018, 6:33 a.m. No.1100499   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0958

>>1098359

Did any anon mention that the EPA has also been weaponized to steal land, and punitively damage selected targets of the deep state?

 

www.theblaze.com/news/2012/01/09/supreme-court-justices-blast-epa-for-telling-couple-they-cant-build-on-protected-wetlands

 

thefederalist.com/2016/02/11/epa-goes-after-low-income-farmers-in-land-grab/

 

www.wnd.com/2011/09/348077/

 

www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/05/10/wyoming-welder-facing-16m-in-fines-beats-epa-in-battle-over-stock-pond.html

 

www.atr.org/states-sue-over-epas-unprecedented-land-grab

 

thehill.com/opinion/op-ed/234685-epa-water-rule-is-blow-to-americans-private-property-rights ( Watch the Water )

 

www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/7036-the-epas-property-wrongs-in-america

 

www.eenews.net/stories/1060074935

 

And of course there is the EPA's connection to the Bundy Standoff

 

www.commdiginews.com/politics-2/crowds-roar-video-blm-vs-bundy-ranch-deal-reached-cattle-to-be-returned-14435/

 

Bundy stopped paying grazing fees because the BLM ordered him to restrict the periods when his cattle grazed an area native to the endangered desert tortoise. Obviously, that doesn’t set well with folks who don’t like the Endangered Species Act, the EPA, “The Daily Show,” or Democrats.

 

An environmental group, often leaning pretty far left, sues the EPA over some agenda item they want. Instead of being truly antagonistic opponents, the EPA and these groups are in fact colluding.

 

“Sue and settle agreements allow EPA to convert a state Regional Haze program into a major new set of federal mandates, with no recourse for those affected until it’s too late,” said Bill Kovacs, the Chamber’s senior vice president for Environment, Technology & Regulatory Affairs. “The report outlines the potentially disastrous effects of this regulatory tool being used by the EPA to disregard states sovereignty and take over what Congress clearly determined to be a state environmental responsibility. These federal haze requirements offer only high costs for states, utilities and consumers, with no benefit.” (US Chamber of Commerce)