>https://pastebin.com/5J7T9PSu
You pos. you revert the dough entirely, taking out things that ought to be there and putting trash back into global notables.
You always do that. Say "i'm for anons" and then do whatever you want. you don't care about anons, only about power. And a sense of moral superiority.
you are no patriot. may God have mercy on your soul.
Tavistock and the OSS
Tavistock - The Best Kept Secret In America
Source: CTRL http://ctrl.org
TAVISTOCK INSTITUTE
30 Tabernacle Street
London EC2A 4DD
Formed in 1947, the Tavistock Institute is an independent not-for-profit organization which seeks to combine research in the social sciences with professional practice. Problems of institution-building and organizational design and change are being tackled in all sectors - government, industry and commerce, health and welfare, education, etc. - nationally and internationally, and clients range from multinationals to small community groups. A growth area has been the use of a developmental approach to evaluation of new and experimental programs, particularly in health, education and community development. This has also produced new training events alongside the regular program of group relations conferences. The Institute owns and edits the monthly journal Human Relations (published by Plenum Press) which is now in its 48th year, and has recently launched (in conjunction with Sage Publications) a new journal Evaluation.
The ideology of American foundations was created by the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations in London. In 1921, the Duke of Bedford, Marquess of Tavistock, the 11th Duke, gave a building to the Institute to study the effect of shellshock on British soldiers who survived World War I. Its purpose was to establish the "breaking point" of men under stress, under the direction of the British Army Bureau of Psychological Warfare, commanded by Sir John Rawlings-Reese.
Tavistock Institute is headquartered in London. Its prophet, Sigmond Freud, settled in Maresfield Gardens when he moved to England. He was given a mansion by Princess Bonaparte. Tavistock's pioneer work in behavioral science along Freudian lines of "controlling" humans established it as the world center of foundation ideology. Its network now extends from the University of Sussex to the U.S. through the Stanford Research Institute, Esalen, MIT, Hudson Institute, Heritage Foundation, Center of Strategic and International Studies at Georgetown, where State Dept. personal are trained, US Air Force Intelligence, and the Rand and Mitre corporations. The personnel of the corporations are required to undergo indoctrination at one or more of these Tavistock controlled institutions. A network of secret groups, the Mont Pelerin Society, Trilateral Commission, Ditchley Foundation, and the Club of Rome is conduit for instructions to the Tavistock network.
Tavistock Institute developed the mass brain-washing techniques which were first used experimentally on American prisoners of war in Korea. Its experiments in crowd control methods have been widely used on the American public, a surreptitious but nevertheless outrageous assault on human freedom by modifying individual behavior through topical psychology. A German refugee, Kurt Lewin, became director of Tavistock in 1932. He came to the U.S. in 1933 as a "refugee", the first of many infiltrators, and set up the Harvard Psychology Clinic, which originated the propaganda campaign to turn the American public against Germany and involve us in World War II. In 1938, Roosevelt executed a secret agreement with Churchill which in effect ceded U.S. sovereignty to England, because it agreed to let Special Operations Executive control U.S. policies.
To implement this agreement, Roosevelt sent General Donovan to London for indoctrination before setting upOSS(now the CIA) under the aegis of SOE-SIS'''.
The entire OSS program, as well as the CIA has always worked on guidelines set up by the Tavistock Institute.
No wonder OSS has now abandoned his former monicker.
https://transformation.dk/www.raven1.net/mcf/tavistock.htm
SOME THOUGHTS ON BAKING
i'm writing this in hopes of clearing up some of the q's that have arisen recently about baking here on /qr/. At least, from one anon's pov.
What is Baking?
Baking is how new Qresearch threads get created and old ones are compacted to make room for the new. Bakers also collected notables, work with the info upfront (the dough), and help new bakers learn how to bake. It's a challenging job that few anons want to do. But to those who do bake, it's something of a calling. Once you start, it's hard to stop.
Why I Bake and How I Got Started
I never wanted to bake. But when the night baker was suddenly called away, there were times when there was nobody to bake and anons would try to do it on the fly. Sometimes there were five breads. After a couple of weeks of this, i got tired of watching it go down. But baking was really scary, even after a lot of practice. Had to be pushed to go live. Was embarrassed countless times by mistakes. But gradually, it grew on me. One day, i realized i actually loved to bake.
Baking is a Tough Job
Why baking is a challenge:
* there's just no way to regular bread speed, which is determined by the number of posts that appear per minute. In a very fast bread, there can be as many as 30 -50 posts per minute, which makes it tough for bakers to keep up
* notables are tough, bc the baker must notice it, read it, evaluate its merits, check the date, check to see whether previously notabled, and that it's 'sauced' (includes a link to a legit source).
* the tasks are diverse - they require lots of different skills: multi-tasking, ignoring distractions, answering questions, staying aware of post count, listing notables, do housekeeping, links breads, and handoffs to a new baker.
* bakers are always running into little "surprises": board lags/hiccoughs/freezes, error messages, inconvenient captchas, etc.
* there are constant attacks on the kitchen. Some are personal. Requires a pretty steady hand to deal with that.
Never Enough Bakers
There are never really enough bakers to fill the demand for 24/7 coverage. It's a burnout job for many. While new bakers arrive, old ones leave. Sometimes there are only about 6-8 regular bakers.
Baker Names
Covering the board is really hard. Makes it easier when bakers know each other a little. So regular bakers find 'name fagging' helpful. Both to resolve problems and create rapport, coz it's important to have each others' six.
Anon Bakers vs Named Bakers
Why are names such a problem? i don't get it. Most of us like to be anon when we aren't baking. It's peaceful. But we also like to check in with other bakers in case they need help.
Anonymity and the Baking Function
Baking is social. It's like a relay race where each baker "carrying the flame" for his own bake passes the torch the next baker. We try not to drop the torch, espec when Q might post. So we need to talk sometimes, so we can keep the breads going.
How Named Bins Promote Transparency/Responsibility
There's another advantage to baker names: they promote transparency. Anons can see who's baking upfront. I think they like this. I'm always surprised on pastebin so see so many anons check out my bin in a short time. Why else would they do this than to see who the baker is?
How Recent Bin System Got Started
The system of asking bakers to present their pastebin/qanonbin began last Spring after certain groups (WR fags) started taking bakes in order to put stuff in the dough that did not belong there, based on anon consensus. An anonymous WR baker would take the bake and make unwanted changes. Next baker would have to unmake them. When they didn't get their way, WR fags would sometimes split the bake, even when Q was posting. This became a big problem. That's how the "upfront bin presentation" came to be used: to prevent WR fags and shill bakers from making mischief with the dough.
Bin System Details
It worked mainly because by that time, most regular bakers were always using baker names. Also, they began using qanonbin (not pastebin) in June, as pastebin became more and more unfriendly to anything Q-related. Baker developed qbin as an alternative. There, a baker never has to use a baker name, just a, UID associated with his bakes based on hashed ID. This lets him build up a track record of his bakes (or practice bakes).
Bin System Criticized coz 'Anyone can bake'
Recently, the bin system has come under attack. The argument goes like this: In QResearch, we say that "anyone can bake." But if an anon must present a bin upfront, then this can't be true, because only those able to present a bin will receive a handoff. This limits the freedom of anons to bake.
But can anyone REALLY bake?
Nope - not right away. The idea that 'anyone can bake' really means that 'anyone is welcome to learn how to bake.''' It takes time and skill to bake. It's ridiculous to say that bakers should hand over a bake to a total beginner, just coz he wants it (and "wants it NOW"). What's gonna happen if he gets the bake, espec in during a busy shift? Next baker's gonna have a mess on his hands.
Bakers who wanna bake have to learn how first
Anyone who wants to learn how to bake has plenty of chances to do it. Just not on a LIVE board. The "power to the people" model of baking just doesn't work. /Comms/ offer a place to do practice baking. But is an anon doesn't want to use it, he can apply to get his own board and practice bake there. Or he can ask the BO at /qrb/ if he can practice bake on that board. But what he can't - or shouldn't - do is to demand to practice on a LIVE qresearch bake. Because Qresearch is where Q posts. And Q deserves better than that.
Who really wants beginners and completely unknown bakers in the kitchen?
Three guesses anons - and the first two don't count. I think there's really only one group that benefits from some kind of radically revisionist model of baking. And that is the same group that benefits from division fagging of all kinds. So excuse me if I don't buy the arguments that "anyone can bake" and "you gotta hand over the dough to anyone who asks." Didn't work when @FJ had "anons only" notables. Not so great for "anons only" baking imo.
Most bakers on this board love to bake. And they love to bake for Q and for anons too. Kitch ain't perfect and bakers can be stubborn and uncooperative at times. Sorry about that, but it's not a perfect world. But to throw the baby out with the bathwater - is that what most anons really want? Do ya'll really think that the regular baking crew are total faggots? I sure hope not. Godspeed anons, WRWY.
>baking is easy
arrogance will not serve you well anon
it does not serve anyone well
baking is easy in theory
and under optimal circumstances
but even so: here's an idea
come to /comms/ right now
and bake the rest of this bread in real time
i'll take a look at the results
Ready?
i've baked over 1000 breads, anon.
That's not arrogance, that's a fact.
I am competent enough to look over a bake.
p.s. i take it your answer is NO.
we know who the real rapist is
like your new baker?
fanatical psychopath
obsessed with "fuckery"
projection much?
this baker picked up a ghost
learn to baker anons
if there were more bakers
there would be no ghosts
and no insane baker
trying to pin mail bomb posts
on other anons
and hoping they get bumfucked in the pen
what would Q think?
maybe we should ask him
who are you, anon?
and if you are not oss, why are you including all this crap at the top in notables?
you have two of my posts under "shills whining"
and why do you refer to "fake comms dough"?
You sound like OSS's BFF
Baker here
Is there a baker or not?
IDK
but after staying up most of last night to help get it in order, I'm outta steam
God bless this bread and all of you
Learn to bake anons
Anyone who wants to , come to /comms/
baking seminar thread
see what Town Hall was all about
link is #25 not #24 - oss took out the current link, new link:
look at baking instructions, vids
ask bakers to help you learn
so you don't have to let crazies bake for you
Shadilay, beloved patriots
-OUT