Anonymous ID: 3143c5 Oct. 10, 2020, 3:21 p.m. No.11017030   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7045 >>7094 >>7109 >>7145 >>7232 >>7237

Anons, Nasal testing appears to have a much more sinister basis…'

 

Been digging on some recent chatter relating to the use of the nasal swap testing protocol, and the heavy research thats been going on for over 10 years now towards nasal delivery of nanoparticle and mRNA type vaccines in order to bypass the blood brain barrier.

 

Apart from the obvious about masks being pointless, I think it's been commonly regarded that if an virus is apparently airborne and mask mandates are enforced that the use of deep nasal swabbing for testing has a clear objective that is not about the test, when a saliva test should obtain the same results if the whole 'droplet' and airborne aspect was accurate.

 

Upon quick searches for 'nasal delivery vaccination' there is an abundance of info and research that has been going on well before this sh1t show kicked off. If i was a betting man, i'd say unfortunately a huge number of people globally have already been mass 'vaccinated' and in a year or two we're going to start seeing the fall out.

 

Nanoparticles for nasal vaccination

February 2009Advanced drug delivery reviews 61(2):140-57

DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2008.09.005

SourcePubMed

 

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/23719063_Nanoparticles_for_nasal_vaccination

 

Abstract

"The great interest in mucosal vaccine delivery arises from the fact that mucosal surfaces represent the major site of entry for many pathogens. Among other mucosal sites, nasal delivery is especially attractive for immunization, as the nasal epithelium is characterized by relatively high permeability, low enzymatic activity and by the presence of an important number of immunocompetent cells. In addition to these advantageous characteristics, the nasal route could offer simplified and more cost-effective protocols for vaccination with improved patient compliance. The use of nanocarriers provides a suitable way for the nasal delivery of antigenic molecules. Besides improved protection and facilitated transport of the antigen, nanoparticulate delivery systems could also provide more effective antigen recognition by immune cells. These represent key factors in the optimal processing and presentation of the antigen, and therefore in the subsequent development of a suitable immune response. In this sense, the design of optimized vaccine nanocarriers offers a promising way for nasal mucosal vaccination."

 

Nanoparticles for nasal vaccination

Author links open overlay panelNoemiCsabaab1MarcosGarcia-Fuentesab1Maria JoseAlonsob

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169409X08002640?via%3Dihub

Anonymous ID: 3143c5 Oct. 10, 2020, 3:39 p.m. No.11017213   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11017150

 

It could very well seem so. The whole basis is on nanoparticles, thus extremely small. On the end of a Q-tip, on tests mostly made in Chyna, which where showing huge numbers of false poositives without even doing any anayalis (ala. Tanzania, pawpaw, goat, Spain/Italy/France/Germany rejecting tests etc.) of a virus produced and delivered from Chyna. You do the math.

 

The back of the nasal cavity is essentially direct access to the brain, its the thinnest portion and thus allows direct transition into the brain fluid, which is then game over. A LOT of the detail floating around on nano-dust/chipping for human interface surrounds direct brain access.

 

My gut suspicion is this is a GIANT global test, that could result in a lot of people dieing in the near future. We already know the Rock3fell@ documents and also the pre-emptive 2025 military population numbers that where getting around, state that this 'excercise' will be active from 2020-2025. We have not even finished the first chapter yet.

Anonymous ID: 3143c5 Oct. 10, 2020, 3:50 p.m. No.11017321   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11017245

 

Correct. You can bet your bottom dollar, based on Fauci's own direct comments several times, that the 'major risk with vaccines' is that they can sometimes make the virus worse…. there is no doubt that the virus was engineered to be more fatal when vaccinated. Logically, there is likely several versions also that vary the fatality responsiveness to reduce suspicion when mass deaths occur and they'll just blame it on the virus being worse than they understand or some crap.

Anonymous ID: 3143c5 Oct. 10, 2020, 3:54 p.m. No.11017364   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11017325

 

SebastianRLC updated his last video he posted in the description, and hints towards the Dems producing some more false allegations and crap on his time at the Apprentice