Anonymous ID: 58c96d April 19, 2018, 10:18 a.m. No.1102300   🗄️.is 🔗kun

With regard to the chems/SRM, try not to get distracted. It is a problem, multi-faceted, with difficulty facing those that try to source the root. If you are looking purely at Solar Radiation Management, you will not get the whole picture. The science is bunk, and they are largely probably just experimenting with the various patents. What is not discussed however, is the usage of an ionized atmosphere for defense purposes. Sky Fortress? So, yes it is evil. inhaling reactive metals through the breathing column is real bad. But, if you have rogue intelligence agencies in the possession of ICBM tech, you also open up a moral dilemma regarding the lesser of two evils. I think long-term, POUTS stops them when there is no longer a threat from rogue agencies to launch strikes on US Soil. However, these assets and tech may just be needed to insulate us from attack. I am holding out hope that this is the reason for there being little to no change in their appearance throughout the last year. Again, just a recommendation from one anon to others. We have a bigger hill to climb first before we eliminate the need for an electrically charged atmosphere. We cannot bounce information signals off of an atmosphere which has not be electrically charged.