>>11022173 (pb Notable about vaccine recipient testing positive for COVID-19)
I think Del Bigtree covered some very relevant information in his latest episode of The HighWire. I capped the title. https://thehighwire.com
Apparently, the goal for a vaccine is pretty limited. It is intended that the vaccine simply reduce some of the noticeable mild/moderate symptoms. Plus for some people the shot is as bad (or worse, imo) than the "disease" it is supposed to prevent. One recipient (may not have gotten the Oxford vaccine, but another) said that future vaccine recipients should prepare to be off work for a day due to sequelae from the shot!
It seems to have vanished from the narrative but early on, a WHO scientist (a woman, but I don't recall her name) slipped up and admitted that asymptomatic people have been shown to NOT spread coronavirus. We have been fed a steady media diet about how this "virus" which has still not been purified from ill patient samples is transmitted with pretty flimsy evidence. As I watch Nancy Pelosi in her ridiculous face diaper reach up and grasp the thing in front to adjust it, it is pretty "darn" obvious that wearing that thing is a gesture at best and an amplifier of spread at worst. If the original "virus" was actually found in bat FECES on the anus of a bat, then what is the probability of transmission via water, toilets etc? If there is nasal carriage of the as yet, not purified "virus" then what is the effectiveness of a cloth mask saturation with respiratory droplets which is frequently touched by the wearer?!
If the virus can easily be spread by droplets and is persistent on surfaces, cloth, etc. then what is being inoculated deep into people's sinuses and next to their CNS tissue with those unholy long swabs (made in China, perhaps?)?
Why do places with mask mandates have HIGHER infection rates than those without?