>>11022975 Editorial - why the 25th Amendment s/b repealed
Posting part of the article so anons don’t have to bounce of board every time a headline is posted
It’s starting to look like the states never should have ratified the 25th Amendment to begin with. At least not the part that deals with a dysfunctional president. Certainly it’s hard to imagine a scheme more nefarious than the one that Speaker Nancy Pelosi is advancing.In one of those crises the Democrats don’t like to let go to waste, it would turn over the task of removing an elected president to a panel of — wait for it — psychiatrists.
Mrs. Pelosi’s plan has nothing to do with President Trump’s case of Covid, contrary to what she suggested in her mincing press conference on Thursday. She suggested the idea was precipitated by the President’s bout of Covid leaving him in an altered state. On Friday, though, she fetched up with the bill a congressman from Maryland, Jamie Raskin, has been nursing. We call it the “Et Tu, Brute! Enablement Act.”
Mr. Rankin’s bill — he’s been nursing it since 2017 — would pick up an unused power granted to Congress in the 25th Amendment. The amendment allows for the temporary removal of the president if the vice president plus a majority of the cabinet declares he’s unable to discharge his duties. The veep and the cabinet majority just have to transmit that declaration to the Speaker and the president pro-tem of the Senate. If two-thirds of each house agrees, the president can be indefinitely sidelined.
By requiring that the vice president get backing from a majority of the cabinet, the amendment has a built-in protection for the president. It’s the president, after all, who names the cabinet in the first place. The 25th, though, has an option. Instead of the cabinet, the vice president could get a majority “of such other body as Congress may by law provide.” The Pelosi-Rankin bill would, for the first time, create such a body.
The New York Sun flies the flag that flew over the newspaper for which Rube Goldberg drew his famous cartoon contraptions. Even Rube, though, would have a hard time matching Mr. Raskin’s “Commission on Presidential Capacity to Discharge the Powers and Duties of the Office.” There’s a nifty précis on Vox. The commission would comprise 17 members, nine of them physicians, including four psychiatric specialists.
In other words, no longer would the president serve at the pleasure of the people. His job could hang on the say-so of a bunch of psychiatrists. We have nothing against these noble comrades. Vesting them with political power, though, strikes us as crazy, even if the Pelosi-Rankin commission were, as the bill suggests, bipartisan. No wonder President Trump sprang on Mrs. Pelosi’s 25th Amendment scheme.