>Apparently this 5d chess game is beyond my intellect.
It’s not your intellect, Anon. It’s that we are in possession of too little substantive information. What we have is often misleading anyway.
>Apparently this 5d chess game is beyond my intellect.
It’s not your intellect, Anon. It’s that we are in possession of too little substantive information. What we have is often misleading anyway.
To defeat document searches in response to FOIA applications/orders.
And fiskebøller
Certainly. Unless an action is accidental (and even then not in all) it is the content of the mind that precedes and contributes to the act. Mental states are responsible for most of the actions humans take in a cascade of cause and effect.
Do you presume that such events are normally distributed? Q often does, financial quants do too. All sorts of surprises flow from false models of reality.
Ockham’s Razor is is an inappropriate interpretive tool where an intent to mislead is baked into the event itself. It’s why spooks get away with so much. O/R is essentially normalcy bias in a mediaeval gown.