>>11027736 /pb
This is q/research not q/investigations.
No one here has the authority to "investigate" anyone. And no one would certainly wish to see an innocent person convicted of any crime they did not commit. This is not a wild lynch mob out for revenge. No one here has singled out Hillary because she is Hillary. Hillary is responsible for her own actions and if she is guilty that will be determined by a court of law.
Anons only do research through available "open source" information. The job that MSM is paid to do, but has a hard time doing so because of conflicting political agenda's and contracts with third parties beholden to a higher authority. We don't have those constrictions.
No one here has access to any classified information and it is certainly not by any means a court of law or to be confused as such. Unfortunately for Hillary, the open source information that has been brought to light thus far seems to be swinging fairly hard in the not so innocent direction. Good luck.