Possible white house insider gives a cogent breakdown from

his POV of the past 4 years….

>>11033908 No you couldn’t. And the idea that Mike Rogers is swamp certainly runs contrary to popular belief,

>>11033936 Cool, but I didn’t say you specifically, I said popular belief. I don’t know about you, but I think independent sources corroborating and expanding on the hypothesizes is a good thing. Did you also think that Rogers did not warn Trump he was being spied on at the 2016 meeting? That had not occurred to me, anyway. Perhaps this plays into why Q said there was a very specific reason they were saving Israel for last. Idk.