>>11039468

if you edit your bland statement of false conjecture to say 'Catholicism isn't all of Christianity' you wouldn't sound like a division shill however, it's still the wrong venue to have this kind of enlightening interlude.

Christianity doesn't represent all of the saved?

He has many folds, so He says.

why dare to pretend to be an expert when someday you could meet The Master and know, and then what would you say?

what would it matter, you might get to that 'place of no words' where there is just The Word, that 'cloud of the unknowing'.

alas, instead you division shill at 8kun, when you could be studying scriptures.

>>11039839

Oranges in Rome have a very special story.

They first came from Spain and were brought to . . .

but I hesitate because if you were really interested in this you'd have already read about this.

and what's there I think . . . is another clue that is 'hidden in full view' but only seems to be seen by the worthy?

ask yourself who it were who went out and . . . tried to heal the hurt and wounded and where did they go?

and then ask where did that all come from?

if you don't know then you really can't understand some of the mysterious history that isn't mysterious at all for those who read and see, and walk around and learn from monuments and mausueleums.

in full view and a mass maybe going on in a minute, so either join in or come back afterwards . . . and make sure you have the right clothes because if you dress like a baker girl, well, they would maybe give you something to cover yourself up with so you can experience the joy of the gathering, that which the ones in charge are now saying 'all are only we3lcome if you sign in on-line first and reserve a time.

how can I clothe the naked or heal the injured if I can't even get close enough to discretely give them some insight. There is a hospital we can go to to the sick, or here is a shawll to wear if you want to cover up and look the part to be in the church . . .

alas.

yes, Oranges in Rome.

but thats a story.

and a place.

and History of Hospitals, I suppose.

>>11039949

and in the case of a grammar-scold, knowing you are a shit.

seriously it only matters here if it's about a tweet made outside of here because what you do is called 'grammer scolding'.

for contracts, in business; for directions, assembly or how to get somewhere; or for writing laws, or in a formal situation with a teacher . . . yes, we use that thing called 'proper grammar.'

but in the real world the rules of 'descriptive grammar' are better used, and the 'rules' of control freak 'kings english' types are only used to harrass at the bar, in the channal, while swimming with the frogs.

>>11040006

considering I didn't proof it, as I rarely do , I didn't make a mistake. It would be fixed in a second draft.

you forget this is shitpost central.

>>11040039

more proof all these shills who squabble about bred and butting-in, must all be in the same office togther:

"if you don't like the BO (body odor) then leave"

wow.

(the preceeding is as if I were a new phag and don't know that BO means 'Bored Owner' or more likely 'board owner')

>>11040082

why tend to other people's business like this, as a nit-picking idget, for someone you don't even know on an anonyomous board other than to be a pester?

you have no other reason.

explain it to those who might actually take you seriously? or do you ever post something witty or useful?

do you ever really share anything here?

seems not.

just a way for you to train yourself in how to be a badger.

or you could learn something. read the posts, do a dig. go visit a foreign place in an on line video and read the monuments.

but no, you scold those who do, and occasionally come in here to do the antishill and read the news.