Thank you, baker.
>no legal President?
Unclear, and untested (because he was (((their))) puppet)
https:// www.law.cornell.edu/wex/natural_born_citizen
>even the Supreme Court isn't really standing up for the Constitution all that much anymore?
True, ever since Marbury vs. Madison.
http:// www.notable-quotes.com/b/bureaucracy_quotes.html
>legally, nothing that can be done when obstruction is obvious?
Correct. Article I, Section 5, Clause 2:
"Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings"
Agreed.
> I was just in disbelief that they would think people are that stupid.
Having been at this for … a few more years …
what struck me was how blatant they were about it.
They weren't assuming stupidity, as much as they were sure they'd get away with it.